Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Weight bias, often known as fat phobia or weight stigma, refers to unfavorable attitudes and stereotypes that are associated with, and applied to, larger bodies. Fat phobia can include an unreasonable and abnormal dread of being overweight or being associated with obese people. Currently, there is no validated tool available to measure fat phobia in Arabic. Measuring fat phobia in Arabic-speaking populations is crucial, because cultural attitudes toward body weight can be quite negative and discriminatory; these negative attitudes can negatively impact mental health. The current study aimed to adapt, translate, and assess the structural validity of the Fat Phobia Scale-Short Form (F-Scale 14) in Arabic.

Methods: The gold standard approach to translation was used. Forward translation involved translation from the English language to the Arabic language by independent translators. Subsequently, a back-translation review was performed on the translated Arabic version for comparison with the original language. A cross-sectional study was conducted online that included 1246 participants from 22 Arabic countries, of whom 74% were female, 66% single, 83% university graduates, with a mean age of 35 ± 6 years.

Results: The F-Scale 14 demonstrated good reliability in the Arabic language, with a Cronbach's α of 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83), comparable to the original scale. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). According to the fit indices, the F-Scale 14 demonstrated a satisfactory level of structural validity in Arab cultures. Fit indices are statistical measures used in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess how well a proposed model fits the observed data. The scale showed a small improvement in factorial structure after the removal of some items. The two items removed were self-indulgent versus self-sacrificing and disliking food versus likes food. The correlation between F-Scale 14 and the figure rating scale was r = 0.76 (p < 0.001), suggesting adequate convergent validity.

Conclusions: The F-Scale 14 is a crucial indicator of attitudes and opinions concerning obese or overweight individuals. Based on increased internal consistency reliability and the problematic cultural relevance of two items, we recommend adopting a 12-item version of the scale for better cultural relevance in Arabic populations. It is anticipated that the Arabic F-Scale-12 will be highly useful for research and clinical purposes. Future research should test and adapt the Fat Phobia Scale for diverse Arabic populations to ensure its cultural relevance. Exploring its application in clinical settings will enhance our understanding of weight stigma and inform targeted interventions that promote body positivity. By addressing these areas, we can develop effective strategies to foster healthier attitudes toward body image in Arabic communities.

Level V: Evidence obtained from a cross-sectional descriptive study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850402PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-025-01727-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fat phobia
24
structural validity
12
arabic version
8
phobia scale-short
8
scale-short form
8
arabic language
8
f-scale demonstrated
8
fit indices
8
arabic
6
fat
6

Similar Publications

Weight stigma is widely recognized as a significant concern in healthcare. Studies indicate that as medical trainees advance through their training, their levels of weight bias may intensify. Such prejudices can lead to inferior care for higher-weight patients, underscoring the urgency for research that identifies factors that are protective against the development of weight bias.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Thin-Ideal Internalisation and Weight Bias Internalisation as Predictors of Eating Pathology: The Moderating Role of Self-Compassion.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

August 2025

Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.

The internalisation of sociocultural ideals and beliefs about weight and shape has long been recognised as an important predictor of disordered eating. However, thin-ideal internalisation and weight bias internalisation (WBI) are generally examined separately in the literature and within sociocultural models of eating disorders. Additionally, self-compassion has been identified as a protective factor against disordered eating, but its role in mitigating the impact of the internalisation of these sociocultural ideals and beliefs has not been investigated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the impact of obesity on social phobia and the therapeutic effect of the antioxidant glutathione on this disorder.

Methods: A total of 600 subjects were divided into an Obese Group and a Control Group. Four scales were utilized to determine social phobia, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy was applied to evaluate the central glutathione levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Problem And Background: Weight stigma is pervasive in maternity care, with significant adverse health consequences. This includes healthcare disengagement along with physiological, behavioural, and emotional sequelae. Addressing weight stigma in maternity care may improve health outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Weight bias in mental health settings: a scoping review.

Front Psychiatry

July 2025

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Introduction: Weight bias is a pervasive form of prejudice, most deeply and directly harming individuals in larger bodies. Although the mental health field strives to promote the delivery of equitable, culturally sensitive care, the prevalence and nature of weight bias in therapeutic contexts are not well understood. This scoping review examines how weight bias manifests within mental health settings and its impacts on client care and outcomes, exploring the issue from both client and provider lenses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF