98%
921
2 minutes
20
As a heterogeneous disease, prostate cancer (PCa) exhibits diverse clinical and biological features, which pose significant challenges for early diagnosis and treatment. Metabolomics offers promising new approaches for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PCa. However, metabolomics data are characterized by high dimensionality, noise, variability, and small sample sizes, presenting substantial challenges for classification. Despite the wide range of applications of deep learning methods, the use of deep learning in metabolomics research has not been extensively explored. In this study, we propose a hybrid model, TransConvNet, which combines transformer and convolutional neural networks for the classification of prostate cancer metabolomics data. We introduce a 1D convolution layer for the inputs to the dot-product attention mechanism, enabling the interaction of both local and global information. Additionally, a gating mechanism is incorporated to dynamically adjust the attention weights. The features extracted by multi-head attention are further refined through 1D convolution, and a residual network is introduced to alleviate the gradient vanishing problem in the convolutional layers. We conducted comparative experiments with seven other machine learning algorithms. Through five-fold cross-validation, TransConvNet achieved an accuracy of 81.03% and an AUC of 0.89, significantly outperforming the other algorithms. Additionally, we validated TransConvNet's generalization ability through experiments on the lung cancer dataset, with the results demonstrating its robustness and adaptability to different metabolomics datasets. We also proposed the MI-RF (Mutual Information-based random forest) model, which effectively identified key biomarkers associated with prostate cancer by leveraging comprehensive feature weight coefficients. In contrast, traditional methods identified only a limited number of biomarkers. In summary, these results highlight the potential of TransConvNet and MI-RF in both classification tasks and biomarker discovery, providing valuable insights for the clinical application of prostate cancer diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674358 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-06016-w | DOI Listing |
BMC Urol
September 2025
Department of Radiology, Osaka Proton Therapy Clinic, 1-27-9 Kasugade naka, Osaka konohana-ku, Osaka, 554-0022, Japan.
Int Urol Nephrol
September 2025
Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Background: With the advancement of MR-based imaging, prostate cancer ablative therapies have seen increased interest to reduce complications of prostate cancer treatment. Although less invasive, they do carry procedural risks, including rectal injury. To date, the medicolegal aspects of ablative therapy remain underexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Cancer
September 2025
Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Background: Docetaxel is the most common chemotherapy regimen for several neoplasms, including advanced OSCC (Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma). Unfortunately, chemoresistance leads to relapse and adverse disease outcomes.
Methods: We performed CRISPR-based kinome screening to identify potential players of Docetaxel resistance.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis
September 2025
Department of Urology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Eur Urol Focus
September 2025
Department of Urology, Medical Centre, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Department of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Background And Objective: Since 2016, >21 000 patients with prostate cancer (PC) used our personalized online decision aid in routine care in Germany. We analyzed the effects of this online decision aid for men with nonmetastatic PC in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods: In the randomized controlled EvEnt-PCA trial, 116 centers performed 1:1 allocation of 1115 patients with nonmetastatic PC to use an online decision aid (intervention = I) or a printed brochure (control = C).