Article Synopsis

  • Early oxygen administration is crucial for severely injured trauma patients, but too much oxygen may lead to higher mortality and respiratory issues.
  • The study aimed to compare a restrictive oxygen strategy (keeping oxygen saturation around 94%) to a liberal strategy (providing high levels of oxygen) in adult trauma patients to see if it would reduce death and major respiratory complications.
  • The trial involved nearly 2000 patients, assigning them to one of the two strategies, and it found that outcomes for death and major respiratory complications were similar in both groups within 30 days.

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Importance: Early administration of supplemental oxygen for all severely injured trauma patients is recommended, but liberal oxygen treatment has been associated with increased risk of death and respiratory complications.

Objective: To determine whether an early 8-hour restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy in adult trauma patients would reduce death and/or major respiratory complications.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult trauma patients transferred directly to hospitals, triggering a full trauma team activation with an anticipated hospital stay of a minimum of 24 hours from December 7, 2021, to September 12, 2023. This multicenter trial was conducted at 15 prehospital bases and 5 major trauma centers in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. The 30-day follow-up period ended on October 12, 2023. The primary outcome was assessed by medical specialists in anesthesia and intensive care medicine blinded to the randomization.

Interventions: In the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a restrictive oxygen strategy (arterial oxygen saturation target of 94%) (n = 733) or liberal oxygen strategy (12-15 L of oxygen per minute or fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.6-1.0) (n = 724) for 8 hours.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days. The 2 key secondary outcomes, death and major respiratory complications within 30 days, were assessed individually.

Results: Among 1979 randomized patients, 1508 completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 50 [31-65] years; 73% male; and median Injury Severity Score was 14 [9-22]). Death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days occurred in 118 of 733 patients (16.1%) in the restrictive oxygen group and 121 of 724 patients (16.7%) in the liberal oxygen group (odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.37]; P = .94; absolute difference, 0.56 percentage points [95% CI, -2.70 to 3.82]). No significant differences were found between groups for each component of the composite outcome. Adverse and serious adverse events were similar across groups, with the exception of atelectasis, which was less common in the restrictive oxygen group compared with the liberal oxygen group (27.6% vs 34.7%, respectively).

Conclusions And Relevance: In adult trauma patients, an early restrictive oxygen strategy compared with a liberal oxygen strategy initiated in the prehospital setting or on trauma center admission for 8 hours did not significantly reduce death and/or major respiratory complications within 30 days.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05146700.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815523PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.25786DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liberal oxygen
28
oxygen strategy
24
trauma patients
20
restrictive oxygen
20
major respiratory
20
oxygen
16
death and/or
16
and/or major
16
respiratory complications
16
oxygen group
16

Similar Publications

The post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era calls for a comprehensive analysis of the recent COVID-19 pandemic to extract important lessons for the international scientific community for the improvement of its readiness towards future pandemic threats and challenges. The present review article presents key aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the main topics covered being the following: i) The recent advances in intensive care, focusing particularly on high flow nasal oxygen therapy; ii) COVID-19 and politics; and iii) COVID-19 and science communication. Both medical aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as non-medical issues, including politics and science communication, should be further evaluated and be definitely included in future medical educational programs, worldwide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Liberating Exciton Transfer as a Pioneering Strategy to Construct Type I Photosensitizers for Hypoxia Deep-Seated Metastases Suppression.

JACS Au

August 2025

Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.

Type I photosensitizers (PSs) have revolutionized traditional photodynamic therapy for hypoxia tumors by eliminating oxygen dependence. Nevertheless, the current development of Type I PSs faces formidable obstacles stemming from the paucity of universal regulatory strategies that steer molecular systems toward efficient reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation through the Type I electron transfer pathway. Herein, we propose the "liberating exciton transfer" strategy to construct a series of Type I PSs (IDMX, X = H, F, Cl, Br) with remarkable generation of superoxide radicals (O ) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The benefits of adopting restrictive transfusion strategies, as opposed to a liberal approach, during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain unclear. This network meta-analysis aims to determine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy is more effective than liberal thresholds in minimizing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and improving secondary outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search (PROSPERO-CRD42025637794) across Medline, Embase, and Scopus was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The optimal transfusion threshold for patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains uncertain.

Methods: We used data from OBLEX (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03714048), an international, prospective, observational study conducted across 12 centres in Australia, Europe, and North America between 2019 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims And Objectives: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the appropriate packed red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) practice for preterm infants consistent with multiple international guidelines.

Method: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India from February 2019 to December 2020. All preterm neonates born at <32 weeks of gestation who received PRBCTs during the study period were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF