Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound v2019 in classifying adnexal masses (AMs) and compare the old and updated systems (v2022).

Patients And Methods: This prospective study enrolled 977 consecutive women with suspected AMs from three institutions between January 2022 and December 2023. Ultrasound examinations were performed by three experienced radiologists who categorized AMs according to O-RADS ultrasound v2019. The same radiologists retrospectively reviewed the stored ultrasound images and provided the O-RADS ultrasound v2022 classification. Histopathology was used as the reference standard to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the O-RADS versions in predicting malignant AMs. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the O-RADS scoring results was evaluated using the Fleiss kappa (κ) test.

Results: The final analysis included 803 women with 855 AMs (219 (25.6%) malignant and 636 (74.4%) benign). Both O-RADS versions demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.906 to 0.923 (v2019) and 0.919 to 0.936 (v2022). The updated v2022 showed a slightly higher accuracy (82.5-86.7% vs. 80.7-85.3%), sensitivity (93.6-95.0% vs. 92.2-94.1%), and specificity (78.1-84.1% vs. 76.1-82.9%) compared to v2019. The IOA for the overall O-RADS classification was perfect for both versions (κ = 0.96-0.97).

Conclusions: The O-RADS ultrasound classification system demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and reliability in predicting malignant AMs, with the updated v2022 showing modest improvements.

Key Points: Question Accurate classification of adnexal masses is essential for management. Can updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 improve diagnostic accuracy and reliability compared to v2019 in predicting malignancies? Findings O-RADS ultrasound v2022 demonstrated slightly higher diagnostic accuracy for identifying malignant adnexal masses compared to v2019, reflecting modest improvements in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance The updated O-RADS ultrasound v2022 provides improved risk stratification for adnexal masses, enhancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more precise clinical decision-making, and improving patient outcomes through timely intervention or tailored management strategies in ovarian cancer care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11235-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

o-rads ultrasound
32
diagnostic accuracy
24
adnexal masses
20
ultrasound v2022
16
o-rads
12
accuracy reliability
12
compared v2019
12
ultrasound
10
data system
8
system o-rads
8

Similar Publications

Background: Integrating diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements with existing MR imaging protocols improves the differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal lesions. We aimed to assess the additional value of quantitative ADC in diagnosing adnexal masses classified by the O-RADS-MRI score and evaluate the impact on diagnostic performance.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 159 patients with 218 ovarian masses, classified into benign, borderline, and malignant groups via histopathological evaluation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To develop an MRI-based radiomics model for ovarian masses categorization and to compare the model performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and radiologists' assessments.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 497 patients (249 benign, 248 malignant) allocated to training, internal, and external validation sets (293/124/80 masses, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative MRI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses remains a significant clinical challenge. Although the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Version 2022 (O-RADS US v2022) provides standardized terminology and high sensitivity, its specificity remains suboptimal, potentially leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Incorporating tumor vascularity evaluation via contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and serum tumor markers like CA125 may enhance diagnostic accuracy and help guide clinical management more effectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

O-RADS US versus IOTA simple rules in the diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.

BMC Med Imaging

July 2025

Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Background: Although many studies have validated the diagnostic performance of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems ultrasound (O-‎RADS US), most have been observed by experienced sonologists, and relatively few by junior sonologists. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS US and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SRs) in senior and junior sonologists to determine a more suitable assessment model for general clinical use.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 228 patients diagnosed with adnexal masses (AMs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) is a standardized risk stratification system designed to enhance uniform interpretation and reporting of adnexal masses on MRI. A PubMed search was conducted using the keyword "O-RADS MRI," yielding 61 articles in the search results. After excluding eight articles, 53 articles were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF