98%
921
2 minutes
20
Minimally invasive treatments for cholelithiasis have gained popularity. The complexity of diagnosing and treating choledocholithiasis offers multiple surgical options, including laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and/or endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/EST+LC). To compare outcomes in patients with typical signs, symptoms, laboratory, and imaging features of cholelithiasis combined with common bile duct stones, we retrospectively analyzed the short-term outcomes of LCBDE+LC and ERCP/EST+LC. We analyzed 318 patients with gallbladder stones treated between January 2022 and May 2024. Of these, 152 underwent LCBDE+LC, and 166 underwent ERCP/EST+LC. We compared patients' baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and short-term complications between the two groups. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of choledochal stone removal, while secondary outcomes included length of stay, hospitalization costs, and patient satisfaction. Patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the LCBDE+LC and ERCP/EST+LC groups. Stone clearance rates were comparable (97.37% versus 95.18%, = .306), with a slight advantage in the LCBDE+LC group. The length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the LCBDE+LC group (6.49 ± 1.18 days versus 6.77 ± 1.11 days, < .05). The LCBDE+LC group also had lower total hospitalization costs ($5188.78 ± 861.26 versus $6498.76 ± 1190.58 < .01). Additionally, the incidence of pancreatitis was lower in the LCBDE+LC group (0.66% versus 6.02%, < .01). There were no significant differences between the groups in other short-term complications such as abdominal infection, cholangitis, biliary bleeding, or bile leakage. Postoperative follow-up indicated higher patient satisfaction and acceptance in the LCBDE+LC group (SSQ-8, 85.84 ± 4.31 points versus 81.20 ± 4.54 points, < .01). Our findings suggest that the LCBDE+LC holds promise as a safe and efficacious approach for the management of cholelithiasis combined with common bile duct stones. However, further prospective clinical trials are essential to corroborate these results and confirm their broader applicability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0345 | DOI Listing |
BMC Surg
July 2025
Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Background: Over the past 20 years, one-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has gained wide acceptance for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis (CCL). Despite this, the two-stage endo-laparoscopic approach, consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by LC, remains the most commonly used strategy. This study aims to analyze the efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic management versus two-stage endo-laparoscopic management of CCL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gastrointest Surg
September 2025
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Background: The 2019 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend advanced endoscopic techniques or laparoscopic surgery for the management of difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones (DCBDSs). A treatment approach that focuses on minimizing inflammation while preserving liver function may enhance decision-making and improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, inflammatory markers, and liver function tests (LFTs) in patients with cholelithiasis (CL) and concomitant DCBDSs who underwent either laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with subsequent LC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm Surg
July 2025
Department of Hepatic-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.
ObjectiveTo study the effectiveness of primary sutures after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in treating elderly patients with gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 127 elderly patients with common bile duct stones who were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2023. Based on the suture method of the common bile duct, the patients were divided into the primary suture and T-tube drainage groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pediatr Surg
August 2025
Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Background: Pediatric choledocholithiasis is traditionally managed with an endoscopy-first approach, where Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, ERCP carries risks such as pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, and perforation, and may even be an unnecessary procedure should stones pass spontaneously. An alternative surgery-first approach, utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), power flushing, and glucagon, may offer a more efficient treatment pathway.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Surg
April 2025
Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Objectives: The combined technology of laparoscopy, choledochoscope and gastroscope was used in the treatment of gallbladder stones combined with common bile duct stones, which consists of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure (LCBDE-PC) and combined gastroscopic and choledochoscopic transabdominal nasobiliary drainage (GC-NBD). The clinical effects of the combined technology were evaluated based on hospital stay, hospital costs, postoperative complications, recurrence of stones, and overall patient satisfaction.
Methods: From July 2017 to December 2020, 206 patients with gallbladder stones combined with common bile duct stones were reviewed retrospectively.