Adjunctive Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide for Ischemic Stroke.

N Engl J Med

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis (O.A., P.P., S.P.); the Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine (J.B., I.D., S.D., M.H., P.K.), Emergency Medicine (A.P.), and Radiology (A.V.), University of Cincinnati, and the Department of Pharmacy, Universi

Published: September 2024


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is a standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of combining intravenous thrombolysis with argatroban (an anticoagulant agent) or eptifibatide (an antiplatelet agent) are unclear.

Methods: We conducted a phase 3, three-group, adaptive, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 57 sites in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had received intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset were assigned to receive intravenous argatroban, eptifibatide, or placebo within 75 minutes after the initiation of thrombolysis. The primary efficacy outcome, the utility-weighted 90-day modified Rankin scale score (range, 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes), was assessed by means of centralized adjudication. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after randomization.

Results: A total of 514 patients were assigned to receive argatroban (59 patients), eptifibatide (227 patients), or placebo (228 patients). All the patients received intravenous thrombolysis (70% received alteplase, and 30% received tenecteplase), and 225 patients (44%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy. At 90 days, the mean (±SD) utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores were 5.2±3.7 with argatroban, 6.3±3.2 with eptifibatide, and 6.8±3.0 with placebo. The posterior probability that argatroban was better than placebo was 0.002 (posterior mean difference in utility-weighted modified Rankin scale score, -1.51±0.51) and that eptifibatide was better than placebo was 0.041 (posterior mean difference, -0.50±0.29). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in the three groups (4% with argatroban, 3% with eptifibatide, and 2% with placebo). Mortality at 90 days was higher in the argatroban group (24%) and the eptifibatide group (12%) than in the placebo group (8%).

Conclusions: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset, adjunctive treatment with intravenous argatroban or eptifibatide did not reduce poststroke disability and was associated with increased mortality. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MOST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03735979.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528349PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314779DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous thrombolysis
20
argatroban eptifibatide
16
ischemic stroke
16
intravenous argatroban
12
acute ischemic
12
modified rankin
12
rankin scale
12
argatroban
9
eptifibatide
9
patients
8

Similar Publications

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a recommended treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of vascular risk factors on the outcome of MT outcomes in patients with stroke with LVO and to determine the prevalence of structural epilepsy in these patients. This was a retrospective cohort study involving patients with stroke between 20 and 80 years of age with LVO who underwent MT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of combining the Padua score with D-dimer levels for identifying lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 632 AIS patients who received alteplase treatment at our hospital between September 2019 and October 2023. After applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 172 patients were included in the analysis: 35 patients in the DVT group and 137 patients in the non-DVT group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The role of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with tandem lesions (TL) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a subject of ongoing debate. The substantial clot burden and the potential need for periprocedural antiplatelet therapy during emergent carotid stenting (CAS) add to the complexity of treatment decisions. This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the literature to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of IVT plus EVT versus EVT alone in AIS patients with TL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite being efficacious for acute ischemic stroke, treatment with thrombolysis is often delayed because of the inaccessibility of informed consent from patient proxies. Decisional conflict could be an important contributor to this delay; however, its influencing factors remain unknown. This study sought to survey the decisional conflict of proxies for sufferers of acute ischaemic stroke and explore the influencing factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

MRI versus CT before endovascular thrombectomy in the early time window: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Neuroradiol

September 2025

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France; Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Imaging Brain & Neuropsychiatry, iBrain U1253, INSERM, University of Tours, Tours, France. Electronic

Background: Selection of acute stroke patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) within 6 h from symptom onset can be done using MRI or CT. However, association of either imaging modality with better clinical outcomes or shorter workflow times is still not fully understood.

Methods: We searched Medline and Ovid-Embase for studies comparing outcomes and workflow metrics between patients selected for EVT using CT or MRI from inception to November 30, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF