Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

. Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LEPAD) frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with multisite vascular disease (MVD). While percutaneous revascularization is well-established for both LEPAD and CAD, limited evidence exists for patients eligible for both procedures. Specifically, the feasibility of concomitant LEPAD and CAD percutaneous revascularization remains unknown. . To compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant coronary and lower extremity elective percutaneous revascularization. . Between 2012 and 2021, we included 135 patients in an observational, retrospective single-center registry. The population was stratified into two groups: 45 patients (concomitant group) underwent simultaneous coronary and peripheral percutaneous interventions, and 90 patients (deferred group) underwent two separate procedures within one year. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at one year, while the primary safety endpoint was in-hospital contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). . Study groups were well-balanced in baseline characteristics. In terms of coronary features, the concomitant revascularization group more often underwent single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while the deferred group had multivessel PCI with diffuse coronary disease. No differences were detected in the number of LEPAD lesions between groups. For the primary efficacy endpoint, the incidence of MACE at one year was 37.8% in the concomitant group vs. 34.4% in the deferred group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.64-2.10; = 0.61). No significant differences were found in CIN occurrence between the concomitant and deferred groups (11.1% vs. 8.9%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.36-4.21; = 0.68). . Multisite vascular disease patients eligible for CAD and LEPAD percutaneous revascularization exhibited a high cardiovascular risk profile with diffuse multivessel coronary and lower extremity disease. Our study suggests the efficacy and safety of concomitant coronary and lower extremity percutaneous revascularization based on one-year MACE incidence and in-hospital CIN. However, dedicated studies are warranted to confirm the short- and long-term outcomes of the concomitant revascularization strategy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11313511PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154516DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

percutaneous revascularization
24
lower extremity
16
coronary lower
12
group underwent
12
deferred group
12
coronary
9
coronary peripheral
8
percutaneous
8
peripheral percutaneous
8
revascularization
8

Similar Publications

Background: The clinical benefit of using ICT for coronary stent optimization remains uncertain in randomized trials, in which a unique ICT was used in most cases.

Aim: To assess the clinical impact of intracoronary techniques (ICT) for stent optimization in high-risk patients.

Methods: The OPTI-XIENCE study is a prospective, observational, multicenter international study including high-risk patients undergoing coronary stenting, in whom any ICT was used for stent optimization at the operator's discretion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cardiac event that requires rapid reperfusion therapy. The same reperfusion mechanism that minimizes infarct size and mortality may paradoxically exacerbate further cardiac damage-a condition known as reperfusion injury. Oxidative stress, calcium excess, mitochondrial malfunction, and programmed cell death mechanisms make myocardial dysfunction worse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) on ostial left circumflex (oLCx) is associated with a high rate of adverse events.

Aims: This study aims to compare drug-coated balloons (DCB) and DES in the treatment of oLCx lesions.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing DCB-PCI of de novo oLCx lesions (isolated or in the context of a distal left main bifurcation) in eight international centers from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and compared with a historical cohort of patients who received PCI with DES.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with thick polymers may contribute to local vascular inflammation and late stent thrombosis. Thinner-strut DES, particularly those with biodegradable polymers and ultrathin struts, aim to reduce this risk by minimizing flow disturbance and vascular injury. Nonetheless, the long-term safety and efficacy of ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) compared to durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) are still uncertain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Composite outcomes in cardiovascular trials often group events of unequal clinical importance, and conventional analyses may obscure treatment trade-offs. Generalised pairwise comparisons (GPC), expressed as a win ratio (WR), allow for hierarchical ranking of events and incorporation of recurrent outcomes, providing a potentially more intuitive assessment of benefit-risk.

Methods: In a prespecified exploratory analysis of the 2×2 factorial, randomised CLEAR (Colchicine and Spironolactone in Patients with Myocardial Infarction) trial (7062 patients within 72 hours of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and percutaneous coronary intervention), we applied both time-to-first and recurrent-event GPC to reassess low-dose colchicine (0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF