A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Artificial intelligence-based automatic nidus segmentation of cerebral arteriovenous malformation on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: Accurate nidus segmentation and quantification have long been challenging but important tasks in the clinical management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation (CAVM). However, there are still dilemmas in nidus segmentation, such as difficulty defining the demarcation of the nidus, observer-dependent variation and time consumption. The aim of this study isto develop an artificial intelligence model to automatically segment the nidus on Time-Of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (TOF-MRA) images.

Methods: A total of 92patients with CAVM who underwent both TOF-MRA and DSA examinations were enrolled. Two neurosurgeonsmanually segmented the nidusonTOF-MRA images,which were regarded as theground-truth reference. AU-Net-basedAImodelwascreatedfor automatic nidus detectionand segmentationonTOF-MRA images.

Results: The meannidus volumes of the AI segmentationmodeland the ground truthwere 5.427 ± 4.996 and 4.824 ± 4.567 mL,respectively. The meandifference in the nidus volume between the two groups was0.603 ± 1.514 mL,which wasnot statisticallysignificant (P = 0.693). The DSC,precision and recallofthe testset were 0.754 ± 0.074, 0.713 ± 0.102 and 0.816 ± 0.098, respectively. The linear correlation coefficient of the nidus volume betweenthesetwo groupswas 0.988, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: The performance of the AI segmentationmodel is moderate consistent with that of manual segmentation. This AI model has great potential in clinical settings, such as preoperative planning, treatment efficacy evaluation, riskstratification and follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nidus segmentation
12
nidus
8
automatic nidus
8
cerebral arteriovenous
8
arteriovenous malformation
8
time-of-flight magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance angiography
8
nidus volume
8
artificial intelligence-based
4

Similar Publications