98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis.
Objectives: Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes.
Methods: In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7.
Results: From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively.
Conclusion: The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10804904 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359231217958 | DOI Listing |
Adv Sci (Weinh)
September 2025
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Despite the expanding clinical application of second-generation anti-androgens like enzalutamide (ENZ) in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), therapeutic resistance culminating in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) persists as an unresolved clinical crisis. Through comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic profiling of ENZ-naïve and ENZ-treated tumors, an expansion of ENZ-resistant myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblast (designated STEAP4 myoCAF) is identified that correlates with adverse clinical outcomes. Strikingly, STEAP4 myoCAF demonstrated intrinsic ENZ resistance through a mechanistically novel pathway involving transcription factor binding to IGHM enhancer 3 (TFE3)-mediated autophagy activation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
August 2025
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects of combining enzalutamide with docetaxel versus using docetaxel alone in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that progresses after treatment with abiraterone followed by enzalutamide.
Methods: A retrospective analysis involved 67 mCRPC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University's Urology Department between October 2021 and August 2023. All experienced disease progression after treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
August 2025
Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
To assess the comparative efficacy of intensified systemic treatments in older patients (≥ 65 years) with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) through a network meta-analysis (NMA), and evaluate whether routine use of intensified regimens is justified in this population. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identified randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2024 evaluating first-line systemic therapies in mHSPC. Eligible studies combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, or antiandrogens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Med Sci
August 2025
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
The heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has spurred the exploration of precision therapies based on molecular subtypes, with the androgen receptor (AR)-positive subtype emerging as a potential therapeutic target. The treatment of AR-positive TNBC relies primarily on androgen receptor antagonists, such as enobosarm, bicalutamide, and enzalutamide. To enhance efficacy, researchers are investigating combination therapies that integrate anti-androgen agents with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chem Inf Model
September 2025
H. E. J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan.
The androgen receptor (AR) is a nuclear receptor involved in regulating gene expression, maintaining the sexual phenotype, and contributing to the development of prostate cancer (PCa). The binding of agonists, such as dihydrotestosterone (DHT), triggers conformational changes in the AR, affecting coactivator interactions, and regulates downstream signaling pathways. Although AR activation depends on interactions between its ligand-binding domain (LBD) and coactivators, the precise impact of ligand binding on these interactions remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF