Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Reprocessing of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes and accessories is an essential part of patient safety and quality control in GI endoscopy centers. However, current endoscopic reprocessing guidelines or procedures are not adequate to ensure patient-safe endoscopy. Approximately 5.4 % of the clinically used duodenoscopes remain contaminated with high-concern microorganisms. Thus, the Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan (DEST) sets standards for the reprocessing of GI endoscopes and accessories in endoscopy centers. DEST organized a task force working group using the guideline-revision process. These guidelines contain principles and instructions of step-by-step for endoscope reprocessing. The updated guidelines were established after a thorough review of the existing global and local guidelines, systematic reviews, and health technology assessments of clinical effectiveness. This guideline aims to provide detailed recommendations for endoscope reprocessing to ensure adequate quality control in endoscopy centers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2023.12.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscope reprocessing
12
endoscopy centers
12
society taiwan
8
endoscopes accessories
8
quality control
8
control endoscopy
8
reprocessing
6
endoscopy
5
recommendations guidelines
4
guidelines endoscope
4

Similar Publications

Background: Adequate drying of endoscope channels following reprocessing is critical to inhibit microbial growth. This study evaluated residual moisture and bacterial contamination in endoscopes stored using different cabinets and storage methods.

Methods: EN-580T endoscopes were stored in three cabinets: TJ-908S and TJ-804S (both with active drying) and TM-804S (passive drying).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to perform a multifactorial carbon footprint assessment and sensitivity analysis of the colonoscopy procedure.

Design: One-week single-center prospective study with all outpatients' diagnostic colonoscopies was realized (n=66). A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology evaluated all essential supplies (accessories from 1 to 15), endoscopic procedure (energy consumption, CO2 insufflation, bowel preparation, and sedation), staff and patients transport and waste management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Given the increasing demand for rapid and reliable instrument reprocessing to support surgical schedules and minimize infection risks, this study aims to explore the cleaning efficacy of a pulsed vacuum cleaning and disinfection device on rigid endoscopic instruments in a comparative hospital setting.

Methods: A total of 800 rigid endoscopic instruments scheduled for post-operative cleaning in our hospital's sterilization supply room between July and December 2024 were included in the study. After pre-treatment, the instruments were divided into two groups, with 400 instruments in each group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Single-use versus reusable endoscopes in gastroenterology: Systematic review of full and partial economic evaluations.

Endosc Int Open

July 2025

Centre for Health Economics at Warwick, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Background And Study Aims: Future decision making on health care will need to consider broader environmental and sustainability issues. One example is adoption of single-use endoscopes instead of reusable endoscopes in gastroenterology, largely due to their perceived benefit of reducing cross-infection. Besides considerations related to technical performance, there are differences not only in the cost to healthcare but also in the impact they have on the environment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endoscopy is essential for diagnosis and treatment, but reusable endoscopes pose contamination risks despite strict cleaning. Disposable endoscopes may reduce this risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated their effectiveness in minimizing microbial contamination compared to reusable endoscopes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF