98%
921
2 minutes
20
Importance: The efficacy of vitamin C for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is uncertain.
Objective: To determine whether vitamin C improves outcomes for patients with COVID-19.
Design, Setting, And Participants: Two prospectively harmonized randomized clinical trials enrolled critically ill patients receiving organ support in intensive care units (90 sites) and patients who were not critically ill (40 sites) between July 23, 2020, and July 15, 2022, on 4 continents.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive vitamin C administered intravenously or control (placebo or no vitamin C) every 6 hours for 96 hours (maximum of 16 doses).
Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of organ support-free days defined as days alive and free of respiratory and cardiovascular organ support in the intensive care unit up to day 21 and survival to hospital discharge. Values ranged from -1 organ support-free days for patients experiencing in-hospital death to 22 organ support-free days for those who survived without needing organ support. The primary analysis used a bayesian cumulative logistic model. An odds ratio (OR) greater than 1 represented efficacy (improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both), an OR less than 1 represented harm, and an OR less than 1.2 represented futility.
Results: Enrollment was terminated after statistical triggers for harm and futility were met. The trials had primary outcome data for 1568 critically ill patients (1037 in the vitamin C group and 531 in the control group; median age, 60 years [IQR, 50-70 years]; 35.9% were female) and 1022 patients who were not critically ill (456 in the vitamin C group and 566 in the control group; median age, 62 years [IQR, 51-72 years]; 39.6% were female). Among critically ill patients, the median number of organ support-free days was 7 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the vitamin C group vs 10 (IQR, -1 to 17 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.88 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.73 to 1.06]) and the posterior probabilities were 8.6% (efficacy), 91.4% (harm), and 99.9% (futility). Among patients who were not critically ill, the median number of organ support-free days was 22 (IQR, 18 to 22 days) for the vitamin C group vs 22 (IQR, 21 to 22 days) for the control group (adjusted proportional OR, 0.80 [95% CrI, 0.60 to 1.01]) and the posterior probabilities were 2.9% (efficacy), 97.1% (harm), and greater than 99.9% (futility). Among critically ill patients, survival to hospital discharge was 61.9% (642/1037) for the vitamin C group vs 64.6% (343/531) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.92 [95% CrI, 0.73 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 24.0% for efficacy. Among patients who were not critically ill, survival to hospital discharge was 85.1% (388/456) for the vitamin C group vs 86.6% (490/566) for the control group (adjusted OR, 0.86 [95% CrI, 0.61 to 1.17]) and the posterior probability was 17.8% for efficacy.
Conclusions And Relevance: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, vitamin C had low probability of improving the primary composite outcome of organ support-free days and hospital survival.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04401150 (LOVIT-COVID) and NCT02735707 (REMAP-CAP).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600726 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.21407 | DOI Listing |
Expert Rev Med Devices
September 2025
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA 226014.
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2023 that approximately 1.3 billion people, or 16% of the global population, are living with a disability. Among these, locomotor disabilities constitute a significant portion, underscoring the urgent need for devices that enhance mobility and support daily living.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Fluid management is a critical aspect of care in critically ill patients. While fluid overload has been linked to adverse outcomes, the balance between achieving a negative fluid balance and preserving kidney function presents a clinical challenge, and the significance of diuretic responsiveness in patients in the de-resuscitation phase remains unclear.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between forced diuresis, fluid balance, and clinical outcomes in ICU patients during the de- resuscitation phase.
Med Sci Monit
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Modern anesthesia, intensive care, and emergency medicine rely heavily on neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), first introduced in 1942. These agents not only facilitate endotracheal intubation but also improve surgical conditions by suppressing muscle responses to stimuli. NMBAs function via depolarizing (eg, succinylcholine) or non-depolarizing mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRen Fail
December 2025
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
This study aimed to develop a predictive model and construct a graded nomogram to estimate the risk of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients without preexisting kidney dysfunction undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Patients undergoing LT between January 2022 and June 2023 were prospectively screened. Severe AKI was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 3.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRespir Care
September 2025
Dr. Thomasian and Prof. Wunsch are affiliated with Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Negative-pressure ventilation (NPV) is a form of noninvasive respiratory support in which an external subatmospheric pressure is applied to the thorax to facilitate lung expansion. Although largely supplanted by positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) in modern-day practice, NPV has garnered renewed interest as a potential noninvasive adjunct or alternative to PPV. Appropriate patient selection would be key, particularly in the ICU setting, where NPV is generally contraindicated in patients with severe upper airway obstruction, high oxygenation requirements, or absent airway reflexes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF