Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10920702 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02760-0 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Multiple large language models versus clinical guidelines for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, ChatGPT-4o, Google Gemini, Google Gemini Advanced, and Microsoft Copilot.
Arch Osteoporos
September 2025
Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Unlabelled: The study assesses the performance of AI models in evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis. We found that ChatGPT-4o produced the most appropriate responses, highlighting the potential of AI to enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient care in osteoporosis management.
Purpose: The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) offers the potential for assisting clinical decisions.
Frankenstein, thematic analysis and generative artificial intelligence: Quality appraisal methods and considerations for qualitative research.
PLoS One
September 2025
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Objective: To determine accuracy and efficiency of using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to undertake thematic analysis.
Introduction: With the increasing use of GenAI in data analysis, testing the reliability and suitability of using GenAI to conduct qualitative data analysis is needed. We propose a method for researchers to assess reliability of GenAI outputs using deidentified qualitative datasets.
Evaluating the Accuracy, Completeness, and Readability of Chatbot Responses to Refractive Surgery-Related Patient Questions: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
Cureus
July 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Purpose This study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT and Google Gemini in addressing refractive surgery-related patient questions by analysing the accuracy, completeness, and readability of their responses. Methods A total of 40 refractive surgery-related questions were compiled and categorized into three levels of difficulty: easy, medium, and hard. Responses from ChatGPT and Google Gemini were blinded and evaluated by two experienced ophthalmologists using standardized criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerformance of ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek for non-critical triage support using real-world conversations in emergency department.
BMC Emerg Med
September 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, 15355, Republic of Korea.
Background: Timely and accurate triage is crucial for the emergency department (ED) care. Recently, there has been growing interest in applying large language models (LLMs) to support triage decision-making. However, most existing studies have evaluated these models using simulated scenarios rather than real-world clinical cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFrom algorithms to answers: a comparative analysis of popular search engines and large language models on clubfoot patient education.
J Pediatr Orthop B
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
This study evaluates Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 4o's (ChatGPT-4o's) utility in clinical relevance and accuracy compared with Google for pediatric clubfoot treatment questions. Both were queried for the 15 most frequently asked questions related to pediatric clubfoot treatment, with Google as control. Questions were classified using the modified Rothwell criteria for online sources.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF