98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Young people's ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method.
Objective: This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California, states with contrasting health policy contexts that impact health insurance coverage and access to subsidized family planning services.
Methods: We used baseline survey data from an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial of sexually active students, assigned female at birth, ages 18-25, at 29 community colleges in Texas and California (N = 1,974). We described contraceptive preferences and use, as well as reasons for nonuse of a preferred method. We conducted multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for clustered data, and then calculated the predicted probability of using a preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California by insurance status.
Results: More Texas participants were uninsured than Californians (30% vs. 8%, p<0.001). Thirty-six percent of Texas participants were using their preferred contraceptive method compared to 51% of Californians. After multivariable adjustments, Texas participants had lower odds of using their preferred method (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.48-0.81) compared to those in California. Texas participants in all insurance categories had a lower predicted probability of preferred method use compared to California participants. In Texas, we found a 12.1 percentage-point difference in the predicted probability of preferred method use between the uninsured (27.5%) and insured (39.6%) (p<0.001). Texans reported financial barriers to using their preferred method more often than Californians (36.7% vs. 19.2%, p<0.001) as did the uninsured compared to the insured (50.9% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001).
Conclusion: These findings present new evidence that state of residence plays an important role in young people's ability to realize their contraceptive preference. Young people in Texas, with lower insurance coverage and more limited access to safety net programs for contraceptive care than in California, have lower use of preferred contraception. It has become urgent in states with abortion bans to support young people's access to their preferred methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470945 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290726 | PLOS |
Objective: Understanding alignment of contraceptive preferences and method selection among women living with HIV (WLWH) may improve contraceptive counseling. We examined whether method attribute preferences aligned with method attributes used among WLWH, and identified preference clusters.
Study Design: We used baseline data from WLWH enrolled in a cluster randomized controlled trial of a reproductive health counseling intervention in Kenya.
Access to desired contraceptive care is a critical component of reproductive autonomy. Telemedicine (TM), or the remote provision of clinical services via technology, in community-based health centers has the potential to expand access to family planning services, potentially enhancing both reproductive autonomy and equity. However, little is known about which patient populations use TM for contraceptive services in the US " safety net" (community-based health centers), if there are inequities in access to TM care, or patient preferences for TM contraceptive care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStud Fam Plann
September 2025
In the 30 years since the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, there is no clear consensus on how to best measure population-level contraceptive use and family planning program impact. Widely used metrics have evolved relatively slowly, and some have run counter to a rights-based and person-centered approach that emphasizes individuals' self-identified contraceptive preferences. In this report, we describe the utilization of an understudied family planning measure-women's expressed intent to use (ITU) contraceptives within the next year-and explore its implications for population-level standardized comparisons and family planning programs using the Performance Monitoring for Action program data in 10 low- and middle-income geographies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContracept Reprod Med
September 2025
MD-MPH Program, School of Medicine, Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Background: This study addresses a gap in global research by exploring sociocultural factors and health outcomes related to oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use among middle-aged Iranian women, where non-prescription access is common. It aims to identify determinants of OCP use and its association with chronic diseases in this demographic.
Methods: This study was a secondary cross-sectional analysis which was conducted using baseline data from the Pars Cohort Study, launched in 2012 and included a sample of 4,034 married middle-aged women aged 45–64 years residing in Fars Province, Iran.
BMC Health Serv Res
September 2025
School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong , Hong Kong SAR, China.
Background: The widespread availability of private-sector family planning services in low- and middle-income countries can be complementary to public-sector efforts to increase population coverage of modern contraceptive methods. The comparative advantages of a private-sector family planning program are more locations with shorter wait time. The disadvantages are higher prices and more variation in service quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF