98%
921
2 minutes
20
Unprecedented breakthroughs have been made in cancer immunotherapy in recent years. Particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors have fostered hope for patients with cancer. However, immunotherapy still exhibits certain limitations, such as a low response rate, limited efficacy in certain populations, and adverse events in certain tumors. Therefore, exploring strategies that can improve clinical response rates in patients is crucial. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the predominant immune cells that infiltrate the tumor microenvironment and express a variety of immune checkpoints that impact immune functions. Mounting evidence indicates that immune checkpoints in TAMs are closely associated with the prognosis of patients with tumors receiving immunotherapy. This review centers on the regulatory mechanisms governing immune checkpoint expression in macrophages and strategies aimed at improving immune checkpoint therapies. Our review provides insights into potential therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade and key clues to developing novel tumor immunotherapies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258331 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1199631 | DOI Listing |
Int J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a disease with poor prognosis. While conventional platinum-based chemotherapy has long served as the standard first-line treatment, its survival benefit is limited, particularly in cisplatin-ineligible patients. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates as part of sequential treatment has improved outcomes, with pembrolizumab, avelumab, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) providing survival benefit in later lines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNaunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol
September 2025
Department of Hematology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are increasingly linked to immune-related kidney injury (irKI). This study presents the first bibliometric analysis of irKI research (2000-2025), aiming to identify key trends, mechanistic insights, and pharmacological risk factors. We analyzed 2,179 publications to understand the evolution of irKI research, focusing on areas like T cell-mediated tubular injury, immune system-driven inflammation, and changes in metabolism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmunotherapy
September 2025
Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Currently, the first-line treatment of non-metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is complete resection. In case of unresectable or metastatic MCC, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with avelumab (or in the US also pembrolizumab or retifanlimab) is indicated. We report on a patient with a primary, non-metastatic MCC on the left eyelid and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Res
September 2025
Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Department of Surgery of Spine and Spinal Cord, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Background: Immunotherapy holds significant yet underexplored potential for low-grade glioma (LGG) treatment. We therefore interrogated the role of Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group C (FANCC) as a novel immune checkpoint regulator given its spatial correlation with tumor microenvironments and clinical associations with immunosuppressive markers.
Objectives: FANCC is implicated in various tumor progressions; its role in LGG remains unexplored.
Background: The goal was to explore the impact of the NR1D1 gene on the occurrence, development, and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) using bioinformatics approaches.
Methods: CRC transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA were analyzed to compare NR1D1 expression in tumors and various clinical stages. Survival differences between high and low NR1D1 expression groups were assessed using the R survival package.