Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To describe the clinical and sonographic features of ovarian benign Brenner tumor (BBT) and malignant Brenner tumor (MBT), and to compare performance of four diagnostic models in differentiating them.

Methods: Fifteen patients with BBTs and nine patients with MBTs were retrospectively identified in our institution from January 2003 and December 2021. One ultrasound examiner categorized each mass according to ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS), international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules Risk (SR-Risk) assessment and assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) models with/without CA125. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to compare diagnostic performance.

Results: Patients with MBT had higher CA125 serum level (62.5% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.009) and larger maximum diameter of lesion (89 mm vs. 43 mm, P = 0.009) than did those with BBT. BBT tended to have higher prevalence of calcifications (100% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.012) and acoustic shadowing (93.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.004), and lower color scores manifesting none or minimal flow (100.0% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001). Areas under curves of O-RADS, IOTA SR-Risk and ADNEX models with/without CA125 were 0.896, 0.913, 0.892 and 0.896, respectively. There were no significant differences between them.

Conclusion: BBTs are often small solid tumors with sparse color Doppler signals, which contain calcifications with posterior acoustic shadowing. The most common pattern of MBT is a large multilocular-solid or solid mass with irregular tumor borders, and most were moderately or richly vascularized at color Doppler. These four models have excellent performance in distinguishing them.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06903-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iota simple
8
simple rules
8
rules risk
8
brenner tumor
8
comparison performance
4
performance o-rads
4
o-rads iota
4
risk assessment
4
assessment adnex
4
adnex model
4

Similar Publications

Objective: This study compares the diagnostic performance of the early-stage ovarian malignancy (EOM) score against other risk prediction models for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer.

Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 925 cases from the obstetrics and gynecology departments of two tertiary hospitals from May 2018 to December 2023. The data included gynecologic examination and/or ultrasound findings, menopausal status, ultrasonography features, serum CA125, and HE4 values, which were used to calculate the EOM score and compare it with other algorithms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

O-RADS US versus IOTA simple rules in the diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.

BMC Med Imaging

July 2025

Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Background: Although many studies have validated the diagnostic performance of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems ultrasound (O-‎RADS US), most have been observed by experienced sonologists, and relatively few by junior sonologists. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS US and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SRs) in senior and junior sonologists to determine a more suitable assessment model for general clinical use.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 228 patients diagnosed with adnexal masses (AMs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To prospectively and externally validate O-RADS (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System), RMI 4 (Risk of Malignancy Index), IOTA SR (International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Group Simple Rules) and ADNEX Rules (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa), and compare their diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant Adnexal Masses (AM) in the Indian population.

Study Design: This single-centre diagnostic accuracy study included 100 consecutive consenting women with AM presenting to the gynaecology department at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. Every AM was classified as benign or malignant using O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA SR, and the ADNEX model (with CA 125).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The diagnostic performance of the IOTA methods, the O-RADS lexicon, and the RMI has been validated in prospective and retrospective studies, but most validation studies tested the performance in the hands of experienced ultrasound examiners.

Objective: To prospectively validate the performance of the Risk of Malignancy Index, the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules Risk Model, the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model, and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-step strategy across different types of ultrasound centers in Italy. A retrospective post hoc analysis estimates malignancy prevalence in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System risk groups when using the 2-step strategy or the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System lexicon.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Many risk stratification models have been developed to improve the accuracy of sonographic evaluation of adnexal lesions. Although these models have been validated across various adult populations, their accuracy in the pediatric population remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of three sonography-based risk models in assessing pediatric adnexal lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF