98%
921
2 minutes
20
Unethical behavior is discovered that is more contagious than ethical behavior. This article attempts to propose one of the possible underlying mechanisms-people may have underconfidence bias in information updating due to motivated reasoning, and such bias exhibits in a different direction compared to the overconfident bias documented in the literature on ethical environment, which generate the asymmetric pattern in contagion. This study designs an experiment which relates the unethical behavior to social learning, where a series of subjects with private information about penalty decide sequentially whether to conduct unethical behavior publicly. This study adopts a quantal response equilibrium to construct a structural model for estimation of the bias. In total, 162 university students participated in our experiment and the results confirm the asymmetric patterns that people rely more on others' precedent decisions rather than their private signal; therefore, the bias facilitates the contagion. This study also tests two punishment systems in the experiment and the results suggest a policy: slightly increasing penalties for the "followers" in the early stages would effectively suppress the contagion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951996 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13020172 | DOI Listing |
Subst Use Addctn J
October 2025
Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Objectives: To estimate the effect of the passage of state laws targeting patient brokering on opioid-related outcomes.
Background: In response to growing awareness of unethical substance use disorder (SUD) treatment practices, several states in the United States have passed laws targeting patient brokering and deceptive marketing. Patient brokering and deceptive marketing laws are intended to reduce the chances individuals with SUD interact with bad actors or suffer from adverse outcomes related to inappropriate SUD treatment, but the effectiveness of these laws is unknown.
Behav Sci (Basel)
August 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Confessions carry substantial weight in criminal investigations, yet little is known about the psychological mechanisms underlying suspects' confession decisions. This research tested the hypothesis that situational pressures inherent to accusatorial interrogations deplete suspects' self-regulatory resources, impairing their ability to make rational, self-protective decisions. We examined three potential mechanisms of self-regulatory depletion in accusatorial interrogations: (1) decision-making pressure, (2) fatigue, and (3) depleted self-regulatory reserves.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Psychol (Amst)
September 2025
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui Province on Adolescent, Mental Health and Crisis Intelligence Int
This research provides the first empirical investigation into how embodied experiences influence malevolent creativity. While prior studies have linked embodiment to general creativity, the impact of specific bodily states-such as mask-wearing-on malevolent creativity remains unexplored. Across two between-subjects experiments (Experiment 1: N = 100; Experiment 2: N = 100), we examined the psychological mechanisms underlying this effect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Syst (Basingstoke)
December 2024
The Centre for Simulation, Analytics and Modelling (CSAM), University of Exeter Business School, Exeter, UK.
"Hurt people hurt people" is a phrase which summarises the cyclical nature of painful experiences and harmful actions. Arguably, this cycle of hurt and harm applies to the UK's National Health Service (NHS), where employees are reporting record low levels of physical and mental wellbeing, while experiencing a climate of hostility, bullying and harassment, and pressures to meet targets. Such working environments carry several risks, not only for the employees themselves but also in terms of clinical outcomes for patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF