The Impact of Naloxone Coprescribing Mandates on Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths.

Am J Prev Med

Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (IPOP), Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Published: April 2023


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Since 2017, a total of 10 states have mandated naloxone coprescribing intended to prevent fatal opioid overdoses. This study aims to assess the association between naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates and opioid-involved overdose deaths on the basis of the opioid type.

Methods: Data on overdose deaths from 1999 to 2020 came from the National Center for Health Statistics CDC WONDER Online Database. This study examined deaths stratified by illicit/synthetic opioids and prescription/treatment opioids. Difference-in-difference negative binomial regression models estimated average marginal effects and 95% CIs. Covariates included opioid dispensing rate, Good Samaritan law, pharmacy-based naloxone access law, mandatory use of prescription drug monitoring program, and recreational cannabis dispensaries. Data collection and analysis were conducted in 2022.

Results: Ten states implemented naloxone coprescribing/offering mandates during the period. Coprescribing/offering mandates significantly reduced the number of prescription/treatment overdose deaths by 8.61 per state per quarter (95% CI= -15.13, -2.09), a 16% reduction from the counterfactual estimates. Coprescribing/offering mandates did not significantly impact illicit/synthetic overdose deaths (average marginal effect=0.32; 95% CI= -18.27, 18.91).

Conclusions: Coprescribing/offering mandates prevent overdose deaths for its target population, individuals using prescription/treatment opioids. These mandates do not appear to impact populations using illicit/synthetic opioids; thus, expanded efforts are needed to reach these individuals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

overdose deaths
24
coprescribing/offering mandates
20
naloxone coprescribing
8
mandates opioid-involved
8
opioid-involved overdose
8
naloxone coprescribing/offering
8
illicit/synthetic opioids
8
prescription/treatment opioids
8
average marginal
8
95% ci=
8

Similar Publications

Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in County Jails - Outcomes after Release.

N Engl J Med

September 2025

Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst.

Background: In 2019, seven county correctional facilities (jails) in Massachusetts initiated pilot programs to provide all Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

Methods: This observational study used linked state data to examine postrelease MOUD receipt, overdose, death, and reincarceration among persons with probable opioid use disorder (OUD) in carceral settings who did or did not receive MOUD from these programs from September 1, 2019, through December 31, 2020. Log-binomial and proportional-hazards models were adjusted for propensity-score weights and baseline covariates that remained imbalanced after propensity-score weighting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Contingency Management for Stimulant Use Disorder and Association With Mortality: A Cohort Study.

Am J Psychiatry

September 2025

Michigan Innovations in Addiction Care Through Research and Education (MI-ACRE) Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Objective: While opioid overdose has begun to decrease in recent years, stimulant overdose has continued to increase and has not been adequately addressed. Unlike opioid use disorder, there are no medications approved by the U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Historically, federal regulations limited take-home methadone doses largely due to concerns about methadone-related overdose. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, an emergency federal policy in March 2020 permitted states to expand take-home methadone doses. Our objective was to utilize state-level variation in take-home expansion to compare changes in methadone related overdose death rates among states that opted into and then out of expanded take-home dosing with states that opted into and continued the policy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF