98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction The aim of this study is to determine the characteristics of eye-related emergency department (ED) visits resulting in ophthalmology consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them against an equivalent period from the previous year. Methods In this study, we reviewed the charts of patients who were admitted to ED with ocular complaints between March 11th, 2020 (the date of the first COVID-positive case in our country) and March 11th, 2021 (Study period 1; SP1) and those who were admitted to ED within the equivalent period of the previous year (Study period 2; SP2). The frequency of eye-related cases, the urgency status of complaints, diagnosis, treatment applied, and hospitalization status of the patients were compared. Results The proportion of ophthalmology consultations among all medical departments decreased from 4.52% to 4.04% (p<0.001). There was a 40.5% reduction in eye-related ED admissions during the pandemic, and the top three ocular diagnoses were foreign bodies of the ocular surface (24.3%), corneal abrasion (18.7%), and blow-out fractures (6.2%) during SP1. The proportion of urgent eye-related emergency visits increased during the pandemic year (80.7% of total cases) compared to the year prior to the pandemic (66.0% of total cases) (p<0.001). Although the number of ophthalmology consultations per day decreased during lockdown periods, this decrease was not statistically significant. Conclusion During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of eye-related ED visits decreased in comparison to the year which preceded the pandemic. However, the proportion of urgent visits increased during the pandemic. Understanding the circumstances under which patients seek eye care in EDs is critical to rendering the optimal level of service of available resources.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679986 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30598 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Invest
September 2025
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States of America.
Background: Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, ~10-35% of COVID-19 patients experience long COVID (LC), in which debilitating symptoms persist for at least three months. Elucidating biologic underpinnings of LC could identify therapeutic opportunities.
Methods: We utilized machine learning methods on biologic analytes provided over 12-months after hospital discharge from >500 COVID-19 patients in the IMPACC cohort to identify a multi-omics "recovery factor", trained on patient-reported physical function survey scores.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Importance: Long COVID (ie, post-COVID-19 condition) is a substantial public health concern, and its association with health-related social needs, such as food insecurity, remains poorly understood. Identifying modifiable risk factors like food insecurity and interventions like food assistance programs is critical for reducing the health burden of long COVID.
Objective: To investigate the association of food insecurity with long COVID and to assess the modifying factors of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and employment status.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Centre de recherche intégrée pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada.
Importance: Caregivers of community-dwelling older adults play a protective role in emergency department (ED) care transitions. When the demands of caregiving result in caregiver burden, ED returns can ensue.
Objective: To develop models describing whether caregiver burden is associated with ED revisits and hospital admissions up to 30 days after discharge from an initial ED visit.