Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Dysregulated frontostriatal circuitries are viewed as a common target for the treatment of aberrant behaviors in various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Accordingly, experimental neurofeedback paradigms have been applied to modify the frontostriatal circuitry. The human frontostriatal circuitry is topographically and functionally organized into the "limbic," the "associative," and the "motor" subsystems underlying a variety of affective, cognitive, and motor functions. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding functional magnetic resonance imaging-based neurofeedback studies that targeted brain activations within the frontostriatal circuitry. Seventy-nine published studies were included in our survey. We assessed the efficacy of these studies in terms of imaging findings of neurofeedback intervention as well as behavioral and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the neurofeedback targets of the studies could be assigned to the identifiable frontostriatal subsystems. The majority of studies that targeted frontostriatal circuitry functions focused on the anterior cingulate cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the supplementary motor area. Only a few studies ( = 14) targeted the connectivity of the frontostriatal regions. However, analyses of connectivity changes were reported in more cases ( = 32). Neurofeedback has been frequently used to modify brain activations within the frontostriatal circuitry. Given the regulatory mechanisms within the closed loop of the frontostriatal circuitry, the connectivity-based neurofeedback paradigms should be primarily considered for modifications of this system. The anatomical and functional organization of the frontostriatal system needs to be considered in decisions pertaining to the neurofeedback targets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449529PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.933718DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frontostriatal circuitry
28
studies targeted
12
frontostriatal
11
neurofeedback
8
systematic review
8
neurofeedback paradigms
8
brain activations
8
activations frontostriatal
8
neurofeedback targets
8
circuitry
6

Similar Publications

While the hyper- and hypo- reward or punishment sensitivities (RS, PS) have received considerable attention as prominent transdiagnostic features of psychopathology, the lack of an overarching neurobiological characterization currently limits their early identification and neuromodulation. Here we combined microarray data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas with a multimodal fMRI approach to uncover the neurobiological signatures of RS and PS in a discovery-replication design (N=655 healthy participants, 442 Females). Both RS and PS were mapped separately in the brain, with the functional connectome in the fronto-striatal network encoding reward responsiveness, while the fronto-insular system was particularly engaged in punishment sensitivity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Striatal dopaminergic patterns and clinical features in frontotemporal dementia.

Brain Commun

August 2025

Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases and the Aging Brain, Department of Clinical Research in Neurology, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', 73039 Tricase, Lecce, Italy.

Frontotemporal dementia is a group of neurodegenerative disorders mainly characterized by behavioural and language impairments. While the precise pathophysiology remains elusive, emerging evidence points to an important role of dopamine dysfunction, particularly within the caudate nucleus. Moreover, a theoretical model proposes that frontotemporal dementia manifestations result from a deficit in goal-directed behaviour, which may be related to altered dopamine control of the frontostriatal circuitry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Premature birth has known impacts on brain development, leading to sustained differences in cognitive function throughout the lifespan. Despite known deficits in executive functioning (EF) within individuals born premature, the extent to which neural engagement during executive functioning tasks differs between those born preterm and full-term is not fully understood. Additionally, it is unknown whether regions of differential engagement are the same in children and adults.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Synaptic dysfunction has been implicated as a key mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Most pharmacological therapeutics for schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder temporarily augment chemical synapse function. Nevertheless, medication non-compliance is a major clinical challenge, and behavioral dysfunction often returns following pharmacotherapeutic discontinuation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses.

Neuron

November 2024

Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Electronic address:

Reinforcement learning (RL), particularly in primates, is often driven by symbolic outcomes. However, it is usually studied with primary reinforcers. To examine the neural mechanisms underlying learning from symbolic outcomes, we trained monkeys on a task in which they learned to choose options that led to gains of tokens and avoid choosing options that led to losses of tokens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF