Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Novice runners with pronated feet are at an increased risk of running-related injuries. However, not all runners with pronated feet have increased foot pronation during running. Moreover, although foot muscle morphology is related to static foot alignment, the relationship between foot muscle morphology and foot kinematics during running remains unclear. We aimed to determine foot kinematic patterns during running among novice runners with pronated feet and the presence of a relationship between these foot kinematic patterns and foot muscle morphology.

Methods: Twenty-one novice runners with pronated feet participated in this study, and data on 39 lower limbs were collected. Data on foot kinematics during running (rearfoot strike) were collected using a three-dimensional motion capture system in terms of navicular height (NH) at initial contact and dynamic navicular drop (DND). A hierarchical cluster analysis method was used to identify the optimal number of clusters based on these two foot-related kinematic variables. Following identification of the clusters, differences in cluster variables and cross-sectional areas of selected foot muscles assessed using ultrasonography in each cluster were examined. The muscles of interest included the abductor hallucis, flexor hallucis brevis and longus, flexor digitorum brevis and longus, and peroneus longus.

Results: Three subgroups were identified based on foot kinematics during running: cluster 1, lowest NH at initial contact and larger DND; cluster 2, moderate NH at initial contact and smaller DND; and cluster 3, highest NH at initial contact and larger DND. Clusters 1 and 3 had a larger abductor hallucis compared with cluster 2, and cluster 3 had a larger flexor hallucis brevis compared with cluster 2.

Significance: These subgroups may differ in terms of resistance to and type of running-related injury. Moreover, foot kinematics during running is possibly impacted by the morphology and function of medial intrinsic foot muscles.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.01.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kinematics running
20
runners pronated
20
foot muscle
16
novice runners
16
pronated feet
16
foot kinematics
16
initial contact
16
foot
15
muscle morphology
12
cluster
9

Similar Publications

Background: While the plantar fat pad is known for its role in shock absorption and plantar force distribution during weight-bearing activities, its impact on running biomechanics is not well understood.

Research Question: Does plantar fat pad thickness affect lower limb biomechanics and plantar pressure distribution during running in healthy adults?

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study involved fourteen participants (18-50 years) who ran at their preferred speed on a 10-meter walkway while lower limb kinematics and ground reaction forces were recorded using a motion capture system. Plantar pressure and force on the right foot were measured using a pressure platform.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of forefoot strike and toe-out running on hip contact forces: A musculoskeletal modelling-based study.

J Biomech

September 2025

Human Movement Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia; Translational Health Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is an increasingly significant public health concern, contributing to substantial economic and societal burden worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that running may promote cartilage health through optimal joint loading. However, it remains unclear how modifications to running posture, such as altering footstrike patterns or adjusting foot progression angles, affect hip contact forces (HCF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Estimating braking and propulsion forces during overground running in and out of the lab.

PLoS One

September 2025

John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Accurately estimating kinetic metrics, such as braking and propulsion forces, in real-world running environments enhances our understanding of performance, fatigue, and injury. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a potential solution to estimate kinetic metrics outside the lab when combined with machine learning. However, current IMU-based kinetic estimation models are trained and evaluated within a single environment, often on lab treadmills.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigated the effects of air resistance and drafting on oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower body kinematics during treadmill running. Thirty-three trained distance runners ran at 3.35 to 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Understanding foot joint loading during different dynamic activities is essential information for guiding exercise progression in rehabilitation. While walking and running biomechanics are well studied, joint-specific kinetic data during a single leg drop and hop task, often used in rehabilitation, are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the kinetic behavior of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and MTP-1 joints during a drop-hop task under different visual constraints and (2) to contextualize these findings by comparing them with heel-strike running, to assess the relative loading demands of the drop-hop task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF