Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Quantifying placebo rates and the factors influencing them are essential to inform trial design. We provide a contemporary summary of clinical, endoscopic, histological and safety placebo rates in induction and maintenance clinical trials of ulcerative colitis, and identify factors influencing them.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from April 2014 to April 2020, updating a prior meta-analysis that searched from inception to April 2014. We included placebo-controlled trials of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressives, small-molecules and biologics in adults with ulcerative colitis. Placebo rates were pooled using random-effects and mixed-effects meta-regression models to assess the associated study-level.

Results: In 119 trials [92 induction, 27 maintenance] clinical, endoscopic and histological remission placebo rates for induction trials were 11% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-13%), 19% [95% CI 15-23%] and 15% [95% CI 11-19%], respectively; for maintenance trials, clinical and endoscopic placebo remission rates were 18% [95% CI 12-25%] and 20% [95% CI 15-25%], respectively. Higher endoscopic subscore and a higher rate of exposure to prior biologic therapy at enrolment were associated with lower clinical and endoscopic placebo remission rates. Absence of central reading was associated with an increase in placebo endoscopic response and remission rates. More follow-up visits and increasing trial duration were associated with higher clinical placebo rates.

Conclusions: Placebo rates in ulcerative colitis trials vary according to the endpoint assessed, whether it is for assessment of response or remission, and whether the trial is designed for induction or maintenance. These contemporary rates across different endpoints and drug classes will help to inform trial design.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab135DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

placebo rates
24
clinical endoscopic
20
ulcerative colitis
16
endoscopic histological
12
rates induction
12
induction maintenance
12
remission rates
12
placebo
10
rates
10
histological safety
8

Similar Publications

Dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1) inhibitors constitute a major advance in respiratory disease therapeutics. Through selective blockade of neutrophil serine protease (NSP) activation, these agents establish novel treatment paradigms for inflammatory respiratory conditions characterized by neutrophil-driven pathology. This comprehensive review examines the development status, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of DPP1 inhibitors in neutrophil-driven diseases, particularly non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Managing patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who demonstrate an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid or experience intolerable side effects remains a significant clinical challenge.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists in the treatment of PBC.

Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of dupilumab and mepolizumab in eosinophilic COPD: insights from phase 3 trials.

Respir Med

September 2025

Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Background: Eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eCOPD), characterized by type 2 inflammation, is an emerging target for biologic therapies.

Objective: To indirectly compare the efficacy of dupilumab and mepolizumab in eCOPD, defined as blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL, by synthesizing data from phase 3 randomized controlled trials: BOREAS and NOTUS for dupilumab, MATINEE for mepolizumab.

Methods: We performed an indirect comparison of trial primary and secondary outcomes including annual exacerbation rates (AER), quality of life (St.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Baricitinib has previously been shown to improve clinical response in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the JUVE-BASIS trial. In this post-hoc analysis we aimed to identify whether pharmacodynamic changes in serum biomarkers in response to baricitinib treatment could help reaffirm the clinical utility of baricitinib in patients with JIA.

Methods: JUVE-BASIS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, safety, phase 3 trial, done in 75 centres in 20 countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

DesignRandomized Controlled Trial.ObjectivePostoperative pain after lumbar spine surgery remains a clinical challenge. Fluoroscopy-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been proposed as a feasible technique for reducing pain and opioid use, particularly when ultrasound guidance is not available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF