Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: More than 19% of patients undergoing knee arthroscopies suffers from articular cartilage defects. The chondral or osteochondral lesion has negative impacts on the knee joints function and the life quality of patients. However, the treatment remains challenging as hyaline cartilage is not renewable. The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the data of randomized controlled trials for comparing the postoperative outcomes between osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) and microfracture (MF) procedure. We hypothesized that the outcomes were better in OAT than MF procedure.

Materials And Methods: A systematic literature search of the EMBASE, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The outcome measures include: the rate of excellent or good results, the rate of return to sports, the failure rate, osteoarthritis rate, International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, Lysholm Knee Score, and Tegner scale. The statistical analysis was completed using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) software.

Results: The systematic search identified 7 studies with a total of 346 patients. The pooled result showed significant differences between the two groups in the rate of return to sports and failure. The following outcome scores showed significant improvement (pre- vs postoperatively): Lysholm score (p = 0.02), Tegner scale (p < 0.00001), and ICRS score (p < 0.00001). The differences were not significant in the excellent or good results and the rate of osteoarthritis.

Conclusion: The patients in OAT group may return to play quicker, even return to pre-injury level of activity compared to the MF group. OAT is better than MF procedure in accordance with Lysholm score, Tegner score, ICRS score, and the rate of failure. However, few studies have reported long-term outcomes and there has no uniform criteria for safe return to sports. Further research is needed.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04075-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteochondral autologous
8
autologous transplantation
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
rate return
8
return sports
8
sports failure
8
tegner scale
8
rate
5
comparative efficacy
4

Similar Publications

A novel acetabular injury pattern: Posterior osteochondral impaction without cortical involvement.

Injury

August 2025

Orthopaedic surgery, Pelvis fracture and Arthroplasty Unit, Orthopaedic department, Kasr Alainy hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Introduction: Acetabular fractures typically involve disruption of cortical columns or walls and are well-classified by Judet, Letournel, and AO/OTA systems. However, some injuries involve pure osteochondral impaction of the articular surface without cortical involvement, making them difficult to detect and unclassified by current systems. This study identifies and evaluates a rare, previously undescribed acetabular injury pattern-posterior dome osteochondral impaction without cortical fracture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee in skeletally immature patients, can result in serious long-term sequelae, such as early knee arthrosis. While there is an abundance of studies concerning chondral repair techniques, there have been relatively few studies that have examined outcomes following cartilage repair in skeletally immature patients. Therefore, we planned to answer the following question: does the AMIC® technique result in positive outcomes for the repair of cartilage lesions in the knee in adolescent patients ? Our hypothesis was that the AMIC® technique improves outcomes for skeletally immature patients with an ICRS stage III or IV osteochondral lesion two year after the surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The need for intra-articular osteotomy and potential complications at the donor site may lead some surgeons to avoid using the osteochondral autograft transfer method as a primary surgery, instead considering it a revision procedure for osteochondral lesions of the talus. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that the primary application of osteochondral autograft transfer in cystic talar osteochondral lesions would yield good results and intra-articular osteotomy and donor site would not have a negative effect on long-term clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that osteochondral autograft transfer can be safely applied as a primary treatment for cystic talar osteochondral lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Autologous osteochondral transfer (AOT) is preferred because of its ability to replace defective cartilage with hyaline cartilage. However, longitudinal changes in hyaline cartilage after AOT and their correlation with clinical outcomes remain unclear.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the short- to midterm outcomes of AOT and to investigate the correlation between clinical outcomes and the morphologic and qualitative findings of cartilage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To analyze the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of autologous costochondral transplantation (ACT) in patients with Hepple V osteochondral lesion of talus (OLT), and to analyze the short-to-intermediate-term efficacy.

Methods: Clinical data of 27 patients (27 ankles) with Hepple V OLT admitted in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital between February 2020 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, of which were treated with ACT. The general information, operation time, and hospitalization days of the patients were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF