A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE, EPIRETINAL PROLIFERATION, AND PROGNOSIS OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE CLOSURE. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the effects of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and epiretinal proliferation on surgical outcomes for full-thickness macular hole.

Methods: Nested case-control study with propensity score matching. Patients operated on for full-thickness macular hole between January 2011 and March 2020 were enrolled. The primary outcome was failure of the macular hole closure, and the secondary outcome was unfavorable hole closure (V or λ type closure) at 6 months after the surgery.

Results: Five hundred and thirty-four eyes of 534 patients met the inclusion criteria. After 1:1 propensity score matching (127 pairs), patients demonstrating ERM were more likely to have a failure of hole closure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-6.14) and unfavorable hole closure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.71). Epiretinal membrane spanning the hole margin (hole marginal ERM) greatly increased the likelihood of unfavorable hole closure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.07). Patients with hole marginal-ERM + epiretinal proliferation were more likely to have a failure of hole closure (38.4%) compared with those with no ERM (11.8%).

Conclusion: Patients with ERM had a higher risk for adverse surgical outcomes for full-thickness macular hole closure. The location of the ERM relative to the macular hole and the presence of epiretinal proliferation might affect the surgical outcomes for full-thickness macular hole closure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003262DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hole closure
36
macular hole
24
full-thickness macular
20
epiretinal proliferation
16
hole
14
epiretinal membrane
12
surgical outcomes
12
outcomes full-thickness
12
unfavorable hole
12
closure adjusted
12

Similar Publications