98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought a paradigm shift to cancer treatment. However, little is known about the risk of renal adverse events (RAEs) of ICI-based regimens, especially ICI combination therapy.
Methods: We carried out a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the risk of RAEs between ICI-based regimens and traditional cancer therapy, including chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on tumor types.
Results: Ninety-five eligible RCTs involving 40,552 participants were included. The overall incidence of RAEs, grade 3-5 RAEs, acute kidney injury (AKI), and grade 3-5 AKI was 4.3%, 1.2%, 1.3%, and 0.8%, respectively. Both ICI-based treatment regimens and traditional cancer therapy showed significantly higher risk of RAEs and AKI than the placebo. Among ICI monotherapy, anti-PD-1 (RR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.29-0.91) was significantly safer than anti-CTLA-4 in terms of RAEs. Anti-CTLA-4 showed significantly higher toxicity than anti-PD-1 (RR: 0.33, 95%CI: 0.14-0.77), anti-PD-L1 (RR: 0.38, 95%CI:0.16-0.91), and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 (RR: 0.32, 95%CI: 0.12-0.87) in terms of grade 3-5 RAEs. The difference was not significant between ICI monotherapy and traditional cancer therapy, except that targeted therapy seemed the least toxic therapy in terms of the incidence of AKI. Anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 were associated with higher risk of RAEs than anti-PD-1 (RR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.02-2.56). The difference was not significant between other dual ICI regimens and ICI monotherapy in terms of RAEs and AKI. ICI plus chemotherapy showed increased risk of both RAEs and AKI compared with ICI monotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. The overall results remained robust in the meta-regression and sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Among ICI monotherapy, anti-CTLA-4 appeared to be associated with increased toxicity, especially in terms of grade 3-5 RAEs. Anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 were associated with higher risk of RAEs than anti-PD-1. However, the difference was not significant between other dual ICI regimens and ICI monotherapy in terms of RAEs and AKI. ICIs plus chemotherapy seemed to be the most toxic treatment regimen in terms of RAEs, AKI, and grade 3-5 AKI.
Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020197039.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242344 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.662731 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Department of Urology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JPN.
In patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin (EV) improves overall survival compared to standard chemotherapy. Additionally, for treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, the combination of pembrolizumab and EV demonstrates superior efficacy over platinum-based chemotherapy. Hence, EV becomes a standard treatment option.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmunotherapy
September 2025
Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Currently, the first-line treatment of non-metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is complete resection. In case of unresectable or metastatic MCC, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with avelumab (or in the US also pembrolizumab or retifanlimab) is indicated. We report on a patient with a primary, non-metastatic MCC on the left eyelid and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Rep (Hoboken)
September 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a challenging malignancy characterized by metastatic tumors with an unidentified primary site, even after extensive pathological and radiographic evaluation. Recent advancements in gene expression profiling and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled the identification of potential tissue origins, thereby facilitating personalized treatment strategies. Although most cases of CUP present as adenocarcinomas or poorly differentiated tumors, the treatment remains largely empirical, with limited success from molecularly tailored therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Opin Biol Ther
September 2025
Division of Medical Oncology, "S.G. Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Introduction: From the 1960s and up until 2021, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has represented the standard of care for potentially resectable stage III (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, in recent years, immunotherapy in the form of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized oncology treatment strategies and several ICIs have been investigated for the neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC, both in monotherapy and in combination with other ICIs or chemotherapy.
Areas Covered: Therefore, this paper aims to review the currently available data supporting the role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as to discuss the challenges associated with it.
J Control Release
September 2025
Center for Controlled Chemical Delivery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Electronic address:
Melanoma remains a challenging malignancy despite the significant outcomes achieved with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Here, we investigated a polymer-based chemo-immunotherapy strategy combining KT-1, a backbone-degradable N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-epirubicin conjugate that induces immunogenic cell death (ICD), with MPPA, a multivalent HPMA copolymer-peptide antagonist of PD-L1 (PPA: (NYSKPTDRQYHF). In B16F10 melanoma, a 3-day dosing schedule significantly outperformed 7-day dosing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF