98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Postoperative infectious related complications are not uncommon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Previously, we noted that 7 days of antibiotics did not decrease sepsis rates compared to just perioperative antibiotics in a low risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy population. This study aimed to compare the same regimens in individuals at moderate to high risk for sepsis undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Materials And Methods: Patients were prospectively randomized in this multi-institutional study to either 2 days or 7 days of preoperative antibiotics. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had either a positive preoperative urine culture or existing indwelling urinary drainage tube. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay.
Results: A total of 123 patients at 7 institutions were analyzed. There was no difference in sepsis rates between groups on univariate analysis. Similarly, there were no differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. On multivariate analysis, 2 days of antibiotics increased the risk of sepsis compared to 7 days of antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.9, p=0.031). Patients receiving antibiotics for 2 days had higher rates of staghorn calculus than the 7-day group (58% vs 32%, p=0.006) but post hoc subanalysis did not demonstrate increased sepsis in the staghorn only group.
Conclusions: Giving 7 days of preoperative antibiotics vs 2 days decreases the risk of sepsis in moderate to high risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients. Future guidelines should consider infectious risk stratification for percutaneous nephrolithotomy antibiotic recommendations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001582 | DOI Listing |
This case underscores the importance of meticulous imaging and procedural vigilance during PCNL to prevent rare complications such as IVC penetration. A prompt multidisciplinary response and careful catheter repositioning ensured a favorable outcome, highlighting strategies to safely manage unexpected vascular injuries during urological procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol
September 2025
Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. Electronic address:
World J Urol
September 2025
Department of Urology, , School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University Affiliated Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, 68 Litang Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102218, China.
Objectives: To report outcomes of complete ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for horseshoe kidney (HSK) stones at a high-volume center and evaluate a novel technique (Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery, NAES) for these patients.
Patients And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all HSK stone patients who underwent PCNL at our institution over a 10-year period. The NAES technique was utilized during the most recent 4 years.
Int J Surg
September 2025
Department of Urology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Minerva Urol Nephrol
September 2025
GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Introduction: Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF