Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Peer review during physician chart rounds is a major quality assurance and patient safety step in radiation oncology. However, the effectiveness of chart rounds in detecting problematic treatment plans is unknown. We performed a prospective blinded study of error detection at chart rounds to clarify the effectiveness of this quality assurance step.

Methods And Materials: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System publications were queried for problematic plans approved for treatment that would be detectable at chart rounds. A resident physician, physicist, and dosimetrist collaboratively generated 20 treatment plans with simulated errors identical in nature to those reported to the Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System. These were inserted randomly into weekly chart rounds over 9 weeks, with a median of 2 problematic plans presented per chart rounds (range, 1-4). Data were collected on detection, attendance, length, and number of cases presented at chart rounds. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariable logistic regression with odds ratios.

Results: The median length of chart rounds over the study period was 60 minutes (range, 42-79); median number of cases presented per chart rounds was 45 (range, 38-50). The overall detection rate was 55% (11 of 20). Detection rates were higher for cases presented earlier in chart rounds: 75% versus 25% of problematic plans were detected within 30 minutes of start of chart rounds versus after 30 minutes (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.88; P = .037). Detection rates showed a trend toward increase during the study period but this was not significant: 33% in weeks 1 to 5 and 73% during weeks 6 to 9 (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-36; P = .08).

Conclusions: The detection of clinically significant problematic plans during chart rounds could be significantly improved. Problematic plans are more frequently detected earlier in chart rounds and inserting such plans into chart rounds may enhance detection; however, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. A multi-institutional study is planned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chart rounds
60
problematic plans
20
radiation oncology
16
chart
15
rounds
15
presented chart
12
cases presented
12
study error
8
detection
8
error detection
8

Similar Publications

Coach-athlete interaction is a central component of skill learning in sports. When done well, interventions by a coach can shape an athlete's perceptual, motivational, and physical capacities and dramatically improve performance. Such interaction is not well modelled by thinking of a coach as transferring rules and directives to the individual athlete.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The corpus callosum (CC) is an interhemispheric structure that facilitates communication between the two cerebral hemispheres. Anomalies of the CC are frequent and associated with a wide spectrum of altered neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, variability in diagnostic criteria and the lack of standardized management strategies create challenges for clinicians and anxiety for expectant parents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Copper Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) and hormonal implants are the two most known safe, convenient, highly effective and long-acting reversible contraceptive methods worldwide that prevent pregnancy for all ages without demanding user action. Regardless of these advantages, its utilisation are low among sexually active women in Nigeria. Thus, this study examines trends, levels and predictors of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) among married women of reproductive age in Nigeria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital condition, often necessitating complex heart surgeries that require careful planning by multidisciplinary teams. Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) in CHD care aim to integrate diverse expertise to optimise surgical planning. However, the lack of standardised protocols for conducting these meetings introduces undesirable variability in decision-making processes, potentially impacting patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Families identifying as members of marginalized racial groups may be less likely to attend family-centered rounds (FCR) and receive associated benefits. At our institution, caregivers of Black patients admitted to Hospital Medicine (HM) were less likely to be physically present on FCR than their white counterparts (72.2% vs 81.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF