Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Defining factors associated with severe reflux esophagitis allows for identification of subgroups most at risk for complications of strictures and esophageal malignancy. We hypothesized there might be unique clinical features in patients with reflux esophagitis in a predominantly Hispanic population of a large, safety-net hospital.

Aim: Define clinical and endoscopic features of reflux esophagitis in a predominantly Hispanic population of a large, safety-net hospital.

Methods: This is retrospective comparative study of outpatients and hospitalized patients identified with mild (Los Angeles Grade A/B) and severe (Los Angeles Grade C/D) esophagitis through an endoscopy database review. The electronic medical record was reviewed for demographic and clinical data.

Results: Reflux esophagitis was identified in 382/5925 individuals: 56.5% males and 79.8% Hispanic. Multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, gender, race, body mass index (BMI), tobacco and alcohol use, and hospitalization status with severity as the outcome showed an interaction between gender and BMI (p ≤ 0.01). Stratification by gender showed that obese females had decreased odds of severe esophagitis compared to normal BMI females (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.07-0.47; p < 0.01). In males, the odds of esophagitis were higher in inpatient status (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.52 - 5.28; p < 0.01) and as age increased (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.03 - 1.83; p = 0.03).

Conclusions: We identify gender-specific associations with severe esophagitis in a predominantly Hispanic cohort. In females, obese BMI appears to be protective against severe esophagitis compared to normal BMI, while in men inpatient status and increasing age were associated with increased odds of severe esophagitis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163663PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06482-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reflux esophagitis
20
esophagitis hispanic
12
hispanic population
12
population large
12
large safety-net
12
los angeles
8
angeles grade
8
esophagitis
7
reflux
5
gender-specific risk
4

Similar Publications

The Lyon Consensus 2.0, published in 2023, provides an updated diagnostic framework for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), emphasizing objective physiological testing and introducing the concept of "actionable GERD" to guide individualized therapy. This review evaluates the clinical applicability of this framework in Asia, where normative values require regional adaptation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective Reflux esophagitis (RE) is caused by gastroesophageal acid reflux, whereas the heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) of the cervical esophagus often shows acid secretion. This study investigated whether an intra-esophageal acidic condition in patients with RE or HGM prevents the occurrence of esophageal candidiasis. Materials We enrolled 5,221 adults (males/females: 3,260/1,961, mean age 54.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE), especially in light of long-term safety concerns associated with PPIs. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan compared to PPIs in patients with EE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, including three randomized controlled trials with a total of 658 patients diagnosed with EE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy (PG) are both treatment options for proximal gastric cancer. Currently, there is no consensus on which procedure is better. The aim of this study was to compare the operative outcomes between proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in the treatment of proximal gastric cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been established as a safe and effective intervention for Type I and II achalasia. Studies have shown that short POEM is non-inferior to long POEM, with some evidence of decreased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This meta-analysis aims to systematically review and analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) data comparing clinical and safety outcomes for long and short POEM procedures while further investigating differences in GERD and other long-term clinical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF