The adverse effects of pramipexole on probability discounting are not reversed by acute D or D receptor antagonism.

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Skaggs Hall, Room 3916, 30 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, Unites States. Electronic address:

Published: March 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Pramipexole (PPX) is a D and D dopamine receptor agonist approved for clinical use, which is associated with a higher risk of impulse-control disorders. Using a rat model, we recently found that low doses of the monoamine-depleting agent reserpine (RES; 1 mg/kg/day, SC) dramatically increased the untoward effects of PPX (0.3 mg/kg/day, SC) on probability discounting, a key impulsivity function. To further understand the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying these effects, we first tested whether the combination of PPX and RES may lead to a generalized enhancement in risk taking, as tested in the suspended wire-beam paradigm. The association of RES and PPX did not augment the proclivity of rats to cross the bridge in order to obtain a reward, suggesting that the effects of RES and PPX on probability discounting do not reflect a generalized increase in impulsivity. We then studied what receptors mediate the effects of PPX in RES-treated rats. The combination of RES and PPX increased membrane expression and binding of D, but not D dopamine receptors, in the nucleus accumbens. However, the behavioral effects of PPX and RES were not reduced by acute treatments with the D/D receptor antagonist raclopride (0.01-0.05 mg/kg, SC), the highly selective D receptor antagonist L-741,626 (0.1-1 mg/kg, SC) or the D receptor antagonists GR 103691 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, SC) and SB 277011A (1-10 mg/kg, SC). These findings collectively suggest that the effects of PPX in probability discounting do not reflect generalized enhancements in impulsivity or acute dopamine D or D receptor activation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325630PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.01.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

probability discounting
16
effects ppx
16
res ppx
12
ppx
9
dopamine receptor
8
ppx res
8
ppx probability
8
discounting reflect
8
reflect generalized
8
receptor antagonist
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: To provide insights into the financial burden and opportunity cost of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in the US by using net present value (NPV) of direct medical and nonmedical costs.

Methods: Assumptions, including economic (discount rate, median income, cost-of-living, Social Security and Medicare taxes, public insurance/supplemental benefits, nutrition assistance, and prescription drug assistance), medical (federal National Health Expenditure tables, a recent retrospective claims analysis, and Optum Health claims database) and demographic (mortality rate, increase in mortality due to visual impairment, progression of blindness, probability of survival, retirement rate, rate of disability, and RP diagnosis probability) were made to develop a NPV model. Scenario analyses were performed on benefits and costs arising from patients with RP, if vision could be preserved via novel gene therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The prevalence of keratoconus in New Zealand is higher compared to the global prevalence of 1.38 per 1000, with Māori and Pacific Islander being over-represented. The form of keratoconus in New Zealand has been shown to have a more rapid progression of disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Every day we encounter situations in which decisions require trade-offs between the delay to one reward and the likelihood of receiving another reward. The current study was designed to extend a general discounting framework to gain insights into this fundamental trade-off process. Forty-three undergraduates adjusted the probability of receiving an immediate hypothetical monetary reward (either $200 or $10,000) until that probabilistic reward was judged subjectively equal in value to the same reward received with certainty after a delay (ranging from 1 month to 25 years).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Results from the GEMSTONE-303 trial indicate that compared with placebo plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (PLA-CAP), sugemalimab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (SUG-CAP) as first-line therapy provides clinical benefits for patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥5. However, the addition of sugemalimab increases medical costs. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of SUG-CAP vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of an early childhood obesity prevention intervention providing telephone and short message service (SMS) support to mothers of children aged 2-4 years by socioeconomic position (SEP).

Methods: A model-based SEP-specific economic evaluation of the intervention was conducted. SEP-specific intervention costs and effects at age 5 years were derived from the trial data and applied to a cohort of 4- to 5-year-old Australian children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF