An information-based approach to handle various types of uncertainty in fuzzy bodies of evidence.

PLoS One

Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Published: April 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Fuzzy evidence theory, or fuzzy Dempster-Shafer Theory captures all three types of uncertainty, i.e. fuzziness, non-specificity, and conflict, which are usually contained in a piece of information within one framework. Therefore, it is known as one of the most promising approaches for practical applications. Quantifying the difference between two fuzzy bodies of evidence becomes important when this framework is used in applications. This work is motivated by the fact that while dissimilarity measures have been surveyed in the fields of evidence theory and fuzzy set theory, no comprehensive survey is yet available for fuzzy evidence theory. We proposed a modification to a set of the most discriminative dissimilarity measures (smDDM)-as the minimum set of dissimilarity with the maximal power of discrimination in evidence theory- to handle all types of uncertainty in fuzzy evidence theory. The generalized smDDM (FsmDDM) together with the one previously introduced as fuzzy measures make up a set of measures that is comprehensive enough to collectively address all aspects of information conveyed by the fuzzy bodies of evidence. Experimental results are presented to validate the method and to show the efficiency of the proposed method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957153PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227495PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evidence theory
16
types uncertainty
12
fuzzy bodies
12
bodies evidence
12
fuzzy evidence
12
fuzzy
9
handle types
8
uncertainty fuzzy
8
evidence
8
theory fuzzy
8

Similar Publications

Theories, models and frameworks of school nursing - a scoping review.

BMC Nurs

September 2025

Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Department Evaluation and Implementation Research in Nursing Science, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, D- 28359, Bremen, Germany.

Background: School nursing is a complex clinical specialty practice that varies across different countries. Theories, models and frameworks can inform nursing practice. This scoping review aims to explore the conceptualisation and operationalisation of school nursing in theories, models and frameworks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Competence and control beliefs are core self-evaluations with increasing value as predictors (e.g., in clinical, organizational, environmental, and educational psychology), and they are assumed to have a universal core that is shared across cultures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Among pregnant and postpartum women, decision-making for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is influenced by vaccine safety concerns, misconceptions, shifting vaccine policies, and exclusion in the initial vaccine rollout. This caused confusion and vaccine hesitancy among many groups including pregnant and postpartum women.

Objective: The objective of this study was to understand the multilevel factors that influence vaccine decision-making among pregnant and postpartum women in Pakistan, which is crucial for improving vaccine demand among the vulnerable group-pregnant and postpartum women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) are central to the development and evaluation of implementation strategies supporting evidence-based practice (EBP). However, evidence on how and to what extent TMFs are used in implementation trials remains limited.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the nature and extent of TMF use in implementation trials, identify which TMFs are most frequently employed, and explore temporal trends in their use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From intuitive to structured quality control: implementing checklist-based peer reviews of reports in Norwegian digital forensic units.

Sci Justice

September 2025

Norwegian Fire and Rescue Academy, Erling Johannessens vei 1, 9441 Fjelldal, Norway.

Digital evidence plays a critical role in solving crimes, making its quality essential. This study examines the implementation of a structured, checklist-based peer review process for technical analysis reports within digital forensic units of the Norwegian Police. It incorporates two data collections: a qualitative study based on interviews following a trial implementation, and a quantitative survey assessing peer review practices one year after the trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF