Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01485-7 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Personal memory and distant reading can complement each other: a reply to Gillon.
J Med Ethics
September 2025
Interdisciplinary Centre for Ethics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
We respond to Gillon's critique of our data-driven analysis of the history of (), in which we used a topic model to trace intellectual trends in the journal's first 50 years. Gillon, drawing on his personal memories as 's second (and longest serving) editor, challenges several of our findings, particularly those concerning the prominence and classification of topics such as In this reply, we clarify misunderstandings that led to part of his criticisms of our method. At the same time, we also briefly discuss some nuances of topic modelling, in particular, its reliance on simplified representations of text, sensitivity to modeling choices and topic interpretations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClarifying the consensus on laryngeal preservation strategies - Authors' reply.
Lancet Oncol
September 2025
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Reply to: Comment on: Risk of malignant transformation and infections in congenital lung malformations in adults: a systematic review.
Eur Respir Rev
July 2025
Pediatric Surgery, "F. Del Ponte" Hospital, ASST Settelaghi, Varese, Italy.
https://bit.ly/40QmKIf
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrimary author contact for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review.
World J Methodol
September 2025
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) synthesize and evaluate data, mainly from randomized trials, which then guides the development of clinical recommendations in evidence-based medicine. However, the data and methodological information in the included papers can often be lacking or unclear, and reviewers usually need to contact the authors of included studies for clarifications. Contacting authors is recommended, but it is unclear how often SR teams do it, or what the level of response is.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnmasking enteritis: reply to commentary titled "Clarifying Gastrointestinal toxicity attribution in WP-SBRT: A commentary on Dinesan et al. and proposal of a bladder-bowel displacement index".
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
We thank the authors for their insightful commentary on our manuscript, "Acute Enteritis with Pelvic SBRT: Influence of Bowel Delineation Methods." In this response, we clarify our methodological decision to focus exclusively on acute enteritis and to exclude proctitis. We highlight the distinct clinical profiles of proctitis and enteritis, emphasizing the importance of careful history taking and clinical evaluation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF