Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Hepatic disorders are often associated with changes in the concentration of phosphorus-31 ( P) metabolites. Absolute quantification offers a way to assess those metabolites directly but introduces obstacles, especially at higher field strengths (B ≥ 7T).

Purpose: To introduce a feasible method for in vivo absolute quantification of hepatic P metabolites and assess its clinical value by probing differences related to volunteers' age and body mass index (BMI).

Study Type: Prospective cohort.

Subjects/phantoms: Four healthy volunteers included in the reproducibility study and 19 healthy subjects arranged into three subgroups according to BMI and age. Phantoms containing P solution for correction and validation.

Field Strength/sequence: Phase-encoded 3D pulse-acquire chemical shift imaging for P and single-volume H spectroscopy to assess the hepatocellular lipid content at 7T.

Assessment: A phantom replacement method was used. Spectra located in the liver with sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and no contamination from muscle tissue, were used to calculate following metabolite concentrations: adenosine triphosphates (γ- and α-ATP); glycerophosphocholine (GPC); glycerophosphoethanolamine (GPE); inorganic phosphate (P ); phosphocholine (PC); phosphoethanolamine (PE); uridine diphosphate-glucose (UDPG); nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-phosphate (NADH); and phosphatidylcholine (PtdC). Correction for hepatic lipid volume fraction (HLVF) was performed.

Statistical Tests: Differences assessed by analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison and with a Student's t-test when appropriate.

Results: The concentrations for the young lean group corrected for HLVF were 2.56 ± 0.10 mM for γ-ATP (mean ± standard deviation), α-ATP: 2.42 ± 0.15 mM, GPC: 3.31 ± 0.27 mM, GPE: 3.38 ± 0.87 mM, P : 1.42 ± 0.20 mM, PC: 1.47 ± 0.24 mM, PE: 1.61 ± 0.20 mM, UDPG: 0.74 ± 0.17 mM, NADH: 1.21 ± 0.38 mM, and PtdC: 0.43 ± 0.10 mM. Differences found in ATP levels between lean and overweight volunteers vanished after HLVF correction.

Data Conclusion: Exploiting the excellent spectral resolution at 7T and using the phantom replacement method, we were able to quantify up to 10 P-containing hepatic metabolites. The combination of P magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging data acquisition and HLVF correction was not able to show a possible dependence of P metabolite concentrations on BMI or age, in the small healthy population used in this study.

Level Of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:597-607.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586048PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26225DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

absolute quantification
12
hepatic lipid
8
lipid volume
8
body mass
8
hepatic metabolites
8
bmi age
8
phantom replacement
8
replacement method
8
metabolite concentrations
8
metabolites
5

Similar Publications

Purpose: Non-adherence to inhaled medication poses a significant clinical and economic burden on patients with respiratory diseases. This narrative review provides an overview of key aspects of hair analysis, in general and specific for inhaled medications, and explores the potential of hair analysis as a novel tool to monitor adherence to inhaled medications.

Methods: PubMed searches were conducted to explore four aspects: (1) mechanisms of (inhaled) drug's systemic absorption and deposition in hair; (2) quantification of drugs in hair; (3) factors impacting (inhaled) drug hair concentrations; and (4) clinical studies assessing inhaled medication adherence through hair analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantitative diagnostic method to detect Gardnerella vaginalis by droplet digital PCR.

Pract Lab Med

September 2025

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.

Background: Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAAT) remain one of the most reliable methods for pathogen identification. Given the high false-negative rates associated with traditional staining and microscopic examination, the time-consuming nature and low sensitivity of bacterial culture methods, as well as the inability of conventional NAAT to achieve absolute quantification.

Methods: To achieve rapid and quantitative detection of , we selected the 23S rRNA gene as the target for identification and developed a droplet digital PCR detection method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Cobb angle is a standard method for quantification of scoliosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to guide treatment decisions. Precise and timely curve detection can ensure early referrals, amenable for bracing. Radiology reports serve as a guiding tool for family physicians to expedite specialist referrals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional PET (fPET) identifies stimulation-specific changes of physiological processes, individual molecular connectivity and group-level molecular covariance. Since there is currently no consistent analysis approach available for these techniques, we present a toolbox for unified fPET assessment. The toolbox supports analysis of data obtained with a variety of radiotracers, scanners, experimental protocols, cognitive tasks and species.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Albumin and γ-globulin concentrations in an electrolyte solution have been quantified by a multivariate-regressive Gaussian admittance relaxation times distribution (mgARTD). The mgARTD is built based on the training data consisting of the impedance spectroscopy system measurement result of protein mixture solutions with a known concentration of albumin, γ-globulin, and sodium electrolyte to perform concentration quantification on a prospective protein mixture solution with an unknown concentration. The mgARTD consists of three steps: (1) Prediction step of the peak matrix by Gaussian ARTD (gARTD) with the Gaussian process and peak detection algorithm, (2) Training step of the approximated coefficient matrix ̃ based on the multivariate-regressive formula = + (: multivariate-regression coefficient matrix, : error matrix, and : known concentration matrix of the training data set), and (3) Quantification step of the approximated concentration ̃ based on the Gauss-Newton algorithm from the predicted of the quantification data and the approximated ̃.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF