98%
921
2 minutes
20
We describe results from IMmotion150, a randomized phase 2 study of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) alone or combined with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) versus sunitinib in 305 patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat and PD-L1+ populations. Intent-to-treat PFS hazard ratios for atezolizumab + bevacizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy versus sunitinib were 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.45) and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.82-1.71), respectively; PD-L1+ PFS hazard ratios were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.38-1.08) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.63-1.67), respectively. Exploratory biomarker analyses indicated that tumor mutation and neoantigen burden were not associated with PFS. Angiogenesis, T-effector/IFN-γ response, and myeloid inflammatory gene expression signatures were strongly and differentially associated with PFS within and across the treatments. These molecular profiles suggest that prediction of outcomes with anti-VEGF and immunotherapy may be possible and offer mechanistic insights into how blocking VEGF may overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721896 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3 | DOI Listing |
Lancet Oncol
September 2025
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Electronic address:
Background: The underexplored potential of PD-L1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma highlights an urgent need for novel agents. This trial aimed to compare benmelstobart (a novel PD-L1 inhibitor) plus anlotinib with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Methods: ETER100 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 37 medical sites in China.
Nat Med
August 2025
Barts Health Biomedical Research Center, Queen Mary's University of London ECMC, London, UK.
At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial, first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib showed superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) over sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To assess long-term durability of clinical outcomes and elucidate predictive biomarkers for RCC, we performed efficacy and prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses from KEYNOTE-426 with ≥5 years of follow-up. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib showed sustained benefits in OS (hazard ratio: 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
July 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, 06590, Türkiye.
Introduction: Access to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries. Consequently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still widely used. This study investigates the impact of first-line sunitinib versus pazopanib on survival outcomes with second-line nivolumab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJCO Oncol Pract
July 2025
Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Purpose: In the era of prolonged survival for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) with standard-of-care first-line therapy now including immune checkpoint inhibitor, re-evaluation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic models is overdue.
Methods: Data from 1,052 patients with aRCC treated on the CheckMate-214 phase III randomized trial with first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab or sunitinib were analyzed after minimum 5 years of follow-up. The end point was overall survival (OS).
Ther Adv Med Oncol
July 2025
Department of Urology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, No. 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have been recommended as first-line options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared all existing ICI-based therapies.
Objective: We aimed to analyze the updated data to compare the efficacy of all available ICI-based options for mRCC.
Design: A systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.