Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

We describe results from IMmotion150, a randomized phase 2 study of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) alone or combined with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) versus sunitinib in 305 patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat and PD-L1+ populations. Intent-to-treat PFS hazard ratios for atezolizumab + bevacizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy versus sunitinib were 1.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.45) and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.82-1.71), respectively; PD-L1+ PFS hazard ratios were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.38-1.08) and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.63-1.67), respectively. Exploratory biomarker analyses indicated that tumor mutation and neoantigen burden were not associated with PFS. Angiogenesis, T-effector/IFN-γ response, and myeloid inflammatory gene expression signatures were strongly and differentially associated with PFS within and across the treatments. These molecular profiles suggest that prediction of outcomes with anti-VEGF and immunotherapy may be possible and offer mechanistic insights into how blocking VEGF may overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6721896PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0053-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus sunitinib
12
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
pfs hazard
8
hazard ratios
8
associated pfs
8
pfs
5
clinical activity
4
activity molecular
4
molecular correlates
4

Similar Publications

First-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (ETER100): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Oncol

September 2025

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Background: The underexplored potential of PD-L1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma highlights an urgent need for novel agents. This trial aimed to compare benmelstobart (a novel PD-L1 inhibitor) plus anlotinib with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Methods: ETER100 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 37 medical sites in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial, first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib showed superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) over sunitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To assess long-term durability of clinical outcomes and elucidate predictive biomarkers for RCC, we performed efficacy and prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses from KEYNOTE-426 with ≥5 years of follow-up. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib showed sustained benefits in OS (hazard ratio: 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Access to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains limited in many low- and middle-income countries. Consequently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still widely used. This study investigates the impact of first-line sunitinib versus pazopanib on survival outcomes with second-line nivolumab.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In the era of prolonged survival for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) with standard-of-care first-line therapy now including immune checkpoint inhibitor, re-evaluation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic models is overdue.

Methods: Data from 1,052 patients with aRCC treated on the CheckMate-214 phase III randomized trial with first-line nivolumab + ipilimumab or sunitinib were analyzed after minimum 5 years of follow-up. The end point was overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies have been recommended as first-line options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared all existing ICI-based therapies.

Objective: We aimed to analyze the updated data to compare the efficacy of all available ICI-based options for mRCC.

Design: A systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF