Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

J Neurophysiol

Department of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

Published: January 2018


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often disrupts the integrity of afferent (sensory) axons projecting through the spinal cord dorsal columns to the brain. Examinations of ascending sensory tracts, therefore, are critical for monitoring the extent of SCI and recovery processes. In this review, we discuss the most common electrophysiological techniques used to assess transmission of afferent inputs to the primary motor cortex (i.e., afferent input-induced facilitation and inhibition) and the somatosensory cortex [i.e., somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), dermatomal SSEPs, and electrical perceptual thresholds] following human SCI. We discuss how afferent input modulates corticospinal excitability by involving cortical and spinal mechanisms depending on the timing of the effects, which need to be considered separately for upper and lower limb muscles. We argue that the time of arrival of afferent input onto the sensory and motor cortex is critical to consider in plasticity-induced protocols in humans with SCI. We also discuss how current sensory exams have been used to detect differences between control and SCI participants but might be less optimal to characterize the level and severity of injury. There is a need to conduct some of these electrophysiological examinations during functionally relevant behaviors to understand the contribution of impaired afferent inputs to the control, or lack of control, of movement. Thus the effects of transmission of afferent inputs to the brain need to be considered on multiple functions following human SCI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5866465PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00354.2017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

afferent input
12
spinal cord
12
afferent inputs
12
afferent
8
input sensory
8
cord injury
8
transmission afferent
8
motor cortex
8
human sci
8
sci discuss
8

Similar Publications

The thermal grill elicits central sensitization.

Pain

August 2025

Centre for Multimodal Sensorimotor and Pain Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

The thermal grill, in which innocuous warm and cool stimuli are interlaced, can produce a paradoxical burning pain sensation-the thermal grill illusion (TGI). Although the mechanisms underlying TGI remain unclear, prominent theories point to spinal dorsal horn integration of innocuous thermal inputs to elicit pain. It remains unknown whether the TGI activates peripheral nociceptors, or solely thermosensitive afferents that are integrated within the spinal cord to give rise to a painful experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

CT-Optimal Stimulation Modulates Somatosensory Processing.

Psychophysiology

September 2025

Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory (PNL), Research Center in Psychology (CIPsi), School of Psychology, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Touch has an affective dimension, conveyed through low-threshold mechanoreceptors known as C-tactile (CT) afferents, which are activated by gentle, caress-like contact. While there is evidence that these fibers modulate nociceptive input, their influence on the processing of other somatosensory afferent activity remains largely unknown. In this study, we explored how slow brushing (CT-optimal stimulation) modulates somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (occurring at 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

C2 dorsal root ganglion: the central hub for cervicogenic headache.

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol

October 2025

Division Chief Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Purpose Of Review: The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the mechanisms of cervicogenic headache and the role of the C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) as a central hub for cervicogenic headache.

Recent Findings: The suboccipital muscles have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cervicogenic headaches due to their connections with the dura mater. The myodural bridge (MDB) connects the suboccipital musculature to the spinal dura mater as it passed through the posterior atlanto-occipital and the atlanto-axial interspaces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Whole-brain mapping of afferent and efferent connections of lateral hypothalamic orexinergic neurons in mice.

Brain Res

September 2025

Neuroscience Laboratory for Cognitive and Developmental Disorders, Department of Anatomy, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China. Electronic address:

Orexin (Orx) is a vital peptide neurotransmitter essential for regulating feeding, sleep-wake cycles, and reward-seeking behavior. Orexinergic neurons are predominantly located in the lateral hypothalamus (LH). However, the precise neural connectivity of these neurons across the brain remains insufficiently characterized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Proprioceptive group Ia afferents detect muscle stretch to guide effortless and purposeful movement and make monosynaptic connections with spinal α-motor neurons to mediate reflexes, such as the stretch reflex. It is thought that proprioceptive Ia afferents target motor neurons of the same spinal segment; yet, how this specificity, if any, is established during early development is unknown. Using spinal cord electrophysiology preparations from neonatal mice of both sexes, we identified a developmental period during which proprioceptive la afferents evoke both segmental and intersegmental responses at monosynaptic latencies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF