98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Thromboembolism prevention is central to atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have primarily focused on stroke prevention. Detailed analyses of extracranial thromboembolic events, particularly in patients with low dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), are scarce.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy of NOACs in prevention of extracranial arterial and venous thromboembolism.
Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL through April 2016 for phase III RCTs of NOACs in patients with AF. Information regarding systemic embolism (SE), pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was retrieved and compared by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with a fixed-effects model. A network with additional RCTs involving antiplatelet agents was constructed. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of each treatment was calculated for assessing the best treatment in the network meta-analysis.
Results: Among 72,963 patients with AF from 5 RCTs, relative to warfarin, standard dose NOACs were associated with a lower risk of SE (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.99) and similar risks of PE and DVT (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.35; and RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.24, respectively). Compared with warfarin, risks of SE, PE, and DVT with low dose NOACs were similar. In network meta-analyses, standard dose NOACs were associated with the largest SUCRA for prevention of SE and PE.
Conclusion: In patients with AF, standard dose NOACs were the most efficacious treatment in preventing SE, whereas both dose regimens of NOACs were reasonable alternatives to warfarin in preventing venous thromboembolism.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.12.038 | DOI Listing |
Am J Transl Res
June 2025
Department of Medical, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University Changzhou 213017, Jiangsu, China.
Background: Thromboembolism is a common complication in elderly patients with non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF). Noval oral anticoagulants (NOACs) remain the primary treatment strategy. This study focuses on the optimal dosage and safety of new oral anticoagulants introduced in recent years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Res Cardiol
June 2025
Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinski St., 49100, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a non-pharmacological strategy to prevent stroke and systemic emboli in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data regarding its safety and efficacy profile compared to different oral anti-coagulant regimens remain limited.
Methods: A network meta-analysis compared LAAO, warfarin, and NOACs (standard dose [SD] and low-dose [LD]).
BMJ Open
June 2025
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Objective: To provide insight into how people cope with living with atrial fibrillation (AF) and taking oral anticoagulants (OACs), informing how services and healthcare delivery could be improved to offer the appropriate support patients require, thereby optimising their quality of life and well-being.
Design: A qualitative study employing focus group discussions (FGDs).
Setting: 11 primary care units in a socioeconomically deprived area of the Butantan district in São Paulo, Brazil.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
May 2025
Cardiac Surgery Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation is an indication for left appendage occlusion. All endovascular devices mandate antithrombotic therapies: rebleeding risk remains an issue. To date, there are no reports on gastrointestinal rebleeding and stroke prevention by left appendage occlusion without any antithrombotic therapy in this category of patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Intern Med
March 2025
Population Health Research Institute; Department of Medicine, McMaster University; and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (M.K.W., P.J.D., W.F.M., J.S.H., D.C.).
Background: In several settings, therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior to aspirin for the prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism.
Purpose: To estimate differences in bleeding risks between NOACs and single antiplatelet therapy.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.