98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Objectives: 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been commonly used to reduce propofol injection pain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in decreasing the incidence and intensity of propofol injection pain.
Methods: Online databases of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched as well as reference lists of included studies and recent reviews. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for propofol injection pain were identified. The outcomes included the incidence and intensity of propofol injection pain and adverse effects. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and adopted fixed or random-effects model when proper.
Results: A total of eight RCTs were included in the final analysis. Compared with the control group, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists were related to a decreasing incidence of propofol injection pain (RR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.33-0.56, P < 0.05). Besides, they also effectively alleviated the severity of propofol injection pain. They significantly reduced the number of patients with moderate (RR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.15-0.30, P < 0.05) and severe pain (RR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.10-0.25, P < 0.05) during propofol injection. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and lidocaine were equally effective in preventing propofol injection pain. Moreover, only one article mentioned the adverse effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in two patients.
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists can effectively reduce the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain. Additionally, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may become the alternatives to lidocaine in attenuating propofol injection pain. However, evidence is still limited for the safety of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on propofol injection pain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0375-1 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
September 2025
Plateforme de Biopharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic has intensified shortages in various pharmaceutical products, notably injectable propofol in lipid emulsion form. Its demand surged sharply due to its critical role in intubating patients with respiratory distress during the pandemic, exposing vulnerabilities in the supply chain for this essential product.
Objectives: This project aims to develop an alternative formulation to commercially available propofol products and to evaluate its stability through a detailed study.
J Int Med Res
September 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Lishui People's Hospital, China.
ObjectiveThe sedation protocol for flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy has long been a matter of inconclusiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and provide insights for optimizing clinical anesthesia strategies.MethodsThis study was a randomized, single-blind controlled trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnited European Gastroenterol J
September 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Background: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.
Objective: We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.
Front Pharmacol
August 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Objective: The potential of ciprofol in endoscopic anesthesia is receiving increasing attention. Compared to propofol, ciprofol exhibits stronger sedative effects and requires a lower dosage. This study aimed to compare the safety of ciprofol and propofol in Chinese patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMinerva Anestesiol
August 2025
Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Karachi, Pakistan.
Introduction: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) ensure patient comfort during invasive procedures. While propofol is widely used, its risks include hypotension and bradycardia. Combining it with esketamine may improve sedation and reduce side effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF