Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Purpose: Oncology clinical trials are necessary for the improvement of patient care as they have the ability to confirm the efficacy and safety of novel cancer treatments and in so doing, contribute to a solid evidence base on which practitioners and patients can make informed treatment decisions. However, only 3-5 % of adult cancer patients enroll in clinical trials. Lack of participation compromises the success of clinical trials and squanders an opportunity for improving patient outcomes. This literature review summarizes the factors and contexts that influence cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation.
Methods: An integrative review was undertaken within PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for articles written between 1995 and 2012 and archived under relevant keywords. Articles selected were data-based, written in English, and limited to adult cancer patients.
Results: In the 51 articles reviewed, three main types of factors were identified that influence cancer patients' decision making about participation in clinical trials: personal, social, and system factors. Subthemes included patients' trust in their physician and the research process, undue influence within the patient-physician relationship, and systemic social inequalities. How these factors interact and influence patients' decision-making process and relational autonomy, however, is insufficiently understood.
Conclusions: Future research is needed to further elucidate the sociopolitical barriers and facilitators of clinical trial participation and to enhance ethical practice within clinical trial enrolment. This research will inform targeted education and support interventions to foster patients' relational autonomy in the decision-making process and potentially improve clinical trial participation rates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2581-9 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Should We Routinely Take Chest X-Rays Before Surgery? A Systematic Scoping Review of Clinical Recommendations Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) Instrument.
J Eval Clin Pract
September 2025
Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background: Chest radiography is often performed preoperatively as a common diagnostic tool. However, chest radiography carries the risk of radiation exposure. Given the uncertainty surrounding the utility of preoperative chest radiographs, physicians require systematically developed recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe role of neutrophils in vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Is it time for a SAH clinical trial targeting neutrophils?
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
September 2025
The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating neurological disease, and one of the primary drivers of morbidity after aneurysm rupture is the phenomenon of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Significant knowledge has been gained over the past two decades of the impact of neuroinflammation in DCI; and neutrophils are now believed to play a major role. There is significant human subject data showing the rise of neutrophil related inflammatory markers and neutrophil's association with poor outcome after aSAH, but as of yet no trials involving human subjects have been done specifically targeting neutrophils.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMinimal Clinically Important Difference of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.
Mov Disord Clin Pract
September 2025
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background: The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is the most used outcome measure in clinical trials for cerebellar ataxias. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), a parameter used to assess meaningful change, is not clearly defined.
Objective: To help define MCID for SARA.
Impact of remote follow-up under an intelligent medical collaboration model on health promotion and clinical outcomes in patients with urinary calculi.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban
May 2025
Department of Outpatient, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013.
Objectives: Urinary calculi are characterized by a high recurrence rate, and patients' adherence to self-management after discharge directly affects health outcomes. Traditional offline follow-up models often face problems such as poor compliance and uneven allocation of medical resources, making it difficult to meet individualized health management needs. Remote follow-up provides a novel solution to optimize long-term management, improve health literacy, and enhance clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFinerenone according to insulin resistance in heart failure: Insights from the FINEARTS-HF trial.
Eur J Heart Fail
September 2025
Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Aims: The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a simple, non-invasive measure of insulin resistance. In this exploratory analysis of FINEARTS-HF, we evaluated whether lower eGDR, reflecting greater insulin resistance, is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF).
Methods And Results: The eGDR was calculated at baseline using waist circumference, glycated haemoglobin, and hypertension status.