98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Colonoscopy is considered the most effective method for diagnosing colorectal diseases, but its application is sometimes limited due to invasiveness, patient intolerance, and the need for sedation.
Objective: The aim of this study was to improve the problem of loop formation and shorten the cecal intubation time of colonoscopy by using a magnetic control system (MCS).
Methods: Two experienced gastroenterologists, three trainees, and a novice repeated colonoscopy without or with MCS on three colonoscopy training model simulator cases. These cases were divided into introductory (case 2) and challenging levels (cases 4 and 5). The cecal intubation times were recorded.
Results: For all cases, the average cecal intubation times for the experienced gastroenterologists with MCS were significantly shorter than without MCS (case 2: 52.45 vs. 27.65 s, p < 0.001; case 4: 166.7 vs. 120.55 s, p < 0.01; case 5: 130.35 vs. 100.2 s, p < 0.05). Those of the trainees also revealed significantly shorter times with MCS (case 2: 67.27 vs. 51 s, p < 0.01; case 4: 253.27 vs. 170.97 s, p < 0.001; case 5: 144.1 vs. 85.57 s, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Conducting colonoscopy with MCS is safe and smooth, and shortens the cecal intubation time by navigating the forepart of the colonoscope. In addition, all diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of conventional colonoscopy are retained.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3460-7 | DOI Listing |
Inflamm Bowel Dis
September 2025
Department of internal medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel‑Aviv, Israel.
Objectives: The real-world efficacy of computer-aided detection (CADe) in improving surveillance colonoscopy performance for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been established.
Methods: A retrospective, single-center study of surveillance colonoscopies in patients with IBD. Only colonoscopies indicated for surveillance, with adequate preparation and documented cecal intubation, were included.
BMC Gastroenterol
August 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Background: Colonoscopy is important for diagnosis, assessment and dysplasia screening in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A good bowel preparation is required for complete and adequate assessment.
Trial Design: Randomised, assessor blinded parallel arm trial with 1:1 allocation.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
October 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aim: This scoping review aims to map evidence on sex differences in colonoscopy sedation use and their impact on colonoscopy quality indicators (CQIs).
Methods: The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search will be conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
Medicine (Baltimore)
August 2025
Department of Emergency, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Colonoscopy provides limited protection against interval colorectal cancer. This study aims to investigate the application value of transparent-cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) regarding cecal intubation time and polyp detection rate. This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited 480 patients in our hospitals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Gastroenterol Rep
August 2025
University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Purpose Of Review: This review summarizes current landscape of colonoscopy quality metrics, with an emphasis on priority intraprocedural indicators. We aim to clarify the rationale, evidence, and practical implementation of both traditional and recently introduced metrics-highlighting which measures are most relevant for improving patient outcomes in 2025.
Recent Findings: The 2024 ACG/ASGE guidelines reaffirmed the core quality indicators of adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), bowel preparation adequacy, and guideline-based surveillance interval assignment.