98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: Evidence of how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the first 6 weeks of postoperative recovery is needed to inform cost-effectiveness evaluations.
Methods: Pragmatic prospective cohort study design. Consecutive patients requiring elective colorectal surgery were allocated to either laparoscopic or open surgery by administrative staff in a district general hospital in England, 2006-2007. Patients completed two validated, generic measures of HRQOL at baseline (preoperatively) and on multiple occasions in the first 6 weeks postsurgery using diaries (EuroQol five-dimensional [EQ-5D] questionnaire: 16 times; short-form 36 health survey [SF-36]: 4 times; HRQOL was compared between groups at each time point, and overall using repeated-measures analysis.
Results: Of 201 consecutive patients recruited, 32 (15.1%) were unable to complete diaries. Of the remaining 169 patients, 120 (71%) returned completed diaries at 28 days and 105 (62.1%) at 42 days. There was no difference in preoperative HRQOL scores between surgical groups, but the postoperative EQ-5D questionnaire and SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (EQ-5D questionnaire P = 0.005, SF-36 P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with a stoma have worse HRQOL than those without. HRQOL did not differ between the laparoscopic and open stoma patients.
Conclusions: This study presents unique prospective data demonstrating that laparoscopic surgery confers HRQOL benefits for patients in the early recovery period following colorectal surgery, compared with open surgery. Consideration of these data in the context of a cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported separately.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.005 | DOI Listing |
Purpose: To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: The implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for perihilar (PHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) remains limited and a systematic review including only comparative studies of MILS versus the open approach is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in patients with hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Methods: Systematic review in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for original studies comparing at least five patients undergoing MILS with open liver surgery for PHC and IHC.
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is used more commonly, but this surge is mostly based on observational data. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between MIPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD published before December 10, 2024.
Surgery
September 2025
Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Background: To compare the short-term outcomes of robotic abdominoperineal resection with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane through March 2024 following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO number: CRD42024520671). Randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies comparing short-term outcomes between the 2 approaches were selected.
Int J Surg
September 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang The Second Affiliated Hospital, University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Background: Enucleation has the advantages of preserving function and avoiding pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms in the pancreatic head. However, laparoscopic enucleation (LEn) of pancreatic head tumors remains challenging in terms of bleeding control and duct integrity preservation because of the complicated blood supply to the pancreatic head and the adjacent relationships of lesions with the main pancreatic duct (MPD), especially for deep-seated or broad-based lesions. Here, we developed a novel dual-arterial occlusion technique to facilitate LEn of pancreatic head tumors and evaluated its feasibility and safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF