98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Despite its established efficacy in reducing recurrence rates for patients with urothelial carcinoma, immediate intravesical chemotherapy is reportedly used infrequently. Accordingly, the Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative implemented a project aimed at understanding and improving the use of immediate intravesical chemotherapy.
Materials And Methods: Surgeons in 5 Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices prospectively collected clinical and baseline intravesical chemotherapy use data for patients undergoing bladder biopsy or transurethral bladder tumor resection from September 2010 through January 2012. In the second phase of data collection (June 2011 through January 2012) treating surgeons also documented reasons for not administering intravesical chemotherapy. We defined patients with 1 to 2 clinical stage Ta/T1, completely resected, papillary tumor(s) as ideal candidates for treatment with immediate intravesical chemotherapy. For ideal and nonideal patients we examined baseline use of intravesical chemotherapy across Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices as well as reasons for not administering therapy among ideal patients.
Results: Among 1,931 patients 37.2% met criteria as ideal cases for intravesical chemotherapy administration. We observed significant variation in the use of intravesical chemotherapy across Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices for ideal (range 27% to 50%) and nonideal cases (9% to 24%) (p <0.001). Reasons for not treating ideal candidates included lack of confirmation of malignancy (4, 2.8%), uncertainty regarding the benefits of intravesical chemotherapy (28, 19.6%) and logistic factors such as the unavailability of medication (34, 23.8%).
Conclusions: Use of immediate intravesical chemotherapy by Urological Surgery Quality Collaborative practices is higher than reported elsewhere but still varies widely, even among ideal candidates. Efforts to optimize use will be aided by disseminating evidence supporting indications and benefits of intravesical chemotherapy, and by addressing local logistic factors that limit access to this evidence-based therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.044 | DOI Listing |
Urol Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
Objective: To evaluate the role of Rescue BCG in the treatment of BCG-unresponsive nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), in order to inform clinical decision-making especially when access to alternative therapies is limited.
Methods: From an institutional database, patients who met the criteria of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC between 2002 and 2023 were identified and sorted into 2 cohorts: those who received additional BCG therapy immediately after BCG-unresponsive designation and those who received alternative treatments such as intravesical chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Lancet Oncol
August 2025
University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Background: Effective treatments are needed for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer scheduled for radical cystectomy who are ineligible for or decline to receive neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate neoadjuvant TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (anti-PD-1) versus cetrelimab monotherapy in this setting.
Methods: SunRISe-4 is a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial being conducted at 109 investigative centres in ten countries worldwide.
Int Urol Nephrol
August 2025
Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Üniversiteler Mahallesi 1604. Cadde No: 9 Çankaya, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Purpose: To evaluate different protocols to increase the efficacy and reliability of single, immediate intravesical postoperative chemotherapy (IPOC) after transurethral bladder tumour resection (TURBT).
Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of 104 patients, who underwent TURBT between October 2020 and October 2022, and were subsequently administered IPOC. The patients were examined in two groups as infusion IPOC (n:50) and bolus IPOC (n:54).
Urology
August 2025
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address:
Objective: To examine the oncologic outcomes in patients treated for UTUC by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) relative to their smoking history in a contemporary cohort that includes use of neoadjuvant and intravesical chemotherapy.
Methods: We analyzed a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with RNU for UTUC between 2000-2020. Patients were classified as never smokers, those with a <20 pack year smoking history, and those with a ≥20 pack years of smoking history.
BJU Int
August 2025
Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Objective: To evaluate which subgroups of patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) benefit from maintenance therapy based on the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) risk stratification, as the role of a maintenance course in patients with IR-NMIBC is debated.
Patients And Methods: We relied on a prospectively maintained database of patients with IR-NMIBC who received intravesical chemotherapy or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) (2010-2023). Patients were stratified according the IBCG prognostic algorithm (no, one to two, and three or more risk factors).