Role of DNA polymerase eta in the bypass of abasic sites in yeast cells.

Nucleic Acids Res

Graduate Center for Toxicology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

Published: August 2004


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Abasic (AP) sites are major DNA lesions and are highly mutagenic. AP site-induced mutagenesis largely depends on translesion synthesis. We have examined the role of DNA polymerase eta (Poleta) in translesion synthesis of AP sites by replicating a plasmid containing a site-specific AP site in yeast cells. In wild-type cells, AP site bypass resulted in preferred C insertion (62%) over A insertion (21%), as well as -1 deletion (3%), and complex event (14%) containing multiple mutations. In cells lacking Poleta (rad30), Rev1, Polzeta (rev3), and both Poleta and Polzeta, translesion synthesis was reduced to 30%, 30%, 15% and 3% of the wild-type level, respectively. C insertion opposite the AP site was reduced in rad30 mutant cells and was abolished in cells lacking Rev1 or Polzeta, but significant A insertion was still detected in these mutant cells. While purified yeast Polalpha effectively inserted an A opposite the AP site in vitro, purified yeast Poldelta was much less effective in A insertion opposite the lesion due to its 3'-->5' proofreading exonuclease activity. Purified yeast Poleta performed extension synthesis from the primer 3' A opposite the lesion. These results show that Poleta is involved in translesion synthesis of AP sites in yeast cells, and suggest that an important role of Poleta is to catalyze extension following A insertion opposite the lesion. Consistent with these conclusions, rad30 mutant cells were sensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and rev1 rad30 or rev3 rad30 double mutant cells were synergistically more sensitive to MMS than the respective single mutant strains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC506798PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh710DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

translesion synthesis
16
mutant cells
16
yeast cells
12
insertion opposite
12
purified yeast
12
opposite lesion
12
cells
10
role dna
8
dna polymerase
8
polymerase eta
8

Similar Publications

Y-family DNA polymerases (Pols) are intrinsically highly error-prone; yet they conduct predominantly error-free translesion synthesis (TLS) in normal human cells. In response to DNA damage, Y-family Pols assemble and function together with WRN, WRNIP1, and Rev1 in TLS. Among these proteins, WRN possesses a 3'→5' exonuclease activity and an ATPase/3'→5' DNA helicase activity, and WRNIP1 has a DNA-dependent ATPase activity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

REV1 is a eukaryotic error-prone DNA polymerase belonging to the Y-family, with a central role in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) to continue DNA replication even in the presence of DNA damage in the template strand. TLS is stimulated by mono-ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a toroidal-shaped protein functioning as a scaffold for DNA polymerases and repair enzymes. Mammals possess four types of Y-family DNA polymerases: Pol η, Pol κ, Pol ι, and REV1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To combat the growing threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria, we need to develop novel antibiotics with unique modes of action. This study investigates the antibacterial properties of BTP-001 toward . BTP-001 targets the β-clamp subunit of the DNA Pol III holoenzyme and is composed of the binding motif APIM linked to a cell-penetrating part composed of 11 arginine residues (R11).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hallmarks of DNA replication stress responses in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

FEMS Microbiol Rev

August 2025

Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CNB-CSIC, 3 Darwin St, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis provide well-studied models for understanding how bacteria manage DNA replication stress (RS). These bacteria employ various strategies to detect and stabilize stalled replication forks (RFs), circumvent or bypass lesions, resolve replication-transcription conflicts (RTCs), and resume replication. While central features of responses to RS are broadly conserved, distinct mechanisms have evolved to adapt to their complex environments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Just bypass it: mechanisms of DNA damage tolerance.

Trends Biochem Sci

August 2025

Biotech Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address:

Lesions on DNA threaten the integrity of replicating genomes, necessitating DNA damage tolerance mechanisms to bypass these lesions and ensure complete duplication of the genome. Lesion bypass by DNA polymerases can occur through either translesion DNA synthesis, which directly synthesizes across the damage, or template switching, which uses the undamaged sister strand as a template to circumvent the lesion. These processes are facilitated by replication fork reversal and/or replication repriming mechanisms, which modulate the progression of the replication fork and its positioning relative to the lesion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF