Severe asthma affects 5-10 % of asthma patients worldwide, imposing a significant burden due to an increased risk of mortality, impaired quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Recent advancements in biologic therapies have transformed asthma management by targeting specific inflammatory pathways, particularly type 2 inflammation. Biologic treatments such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab have demonstrated efficacy in reducing exacerbations, improving lung function, and achieving clinical remission in a subset of patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: It is unclear why patients with post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 sequelae (PACS) often present with persistent respiratory symptoms. We hypothesised that autoimmune inflammatory biomarkers may be associated with the persistence and/or resolution of these symptoms. We performed symptom-based unsupervised cluster analysis to evaluate airway and systemic immune responses in PACS participants over time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Respir Crit Care Med
September 2025
Clinical remission is a multicomponent treatment goal in severe asthma. However, only about 30% of patients achieve clinical remission when treatment decisions are guided using blood eosinophil counts and fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentrations. To assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive, individualized treatment strategy in achieving clinical remission over 24 months in patients with severe asthma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Following the results of the MANDARA trial, this real-life study aimed at comparing the effectiveness and safety profile of mepolizumab versus benralizumab in a European EGPA cohort.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational comparative study including EGPA patients, who received mepolizumab or benralizumab at the asthma dose. Patients were matched 1:1 by sex, age, BVAS and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage at the treatment initiation (T0).
Depemokimab, the first ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, significantly reduced exacerbation rates in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma when administered biannually. While it offers potential benefits for patient adherence and convenience, the trials showed no improvement in symptoms and lung function. Further research is needed to determine its optimal place in therapy and identify patients who will benefit the most.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBreathe (Sheff)
October 2024
The Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly of the European Respiratory Society gathered in Berlin to organise the third Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference in February 2024. The conference covered key points of acute and chronic respiratory failure in adults. During the 3-day conference ventilatory strategies, patient selection, diagnostic approaches, treatment and health-related quality of life topics were addressed by a panel of international experts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF: High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has been shown to reduce exacerbations of COPD and some evidence displays benefits in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) patients. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 12 months of home HFNT on the annual exacerbation rate between mild/moderate and severe NCFB patients, classified by the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI). Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of the dyspnea, pulmonary function, and sputum cultures in both groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBronchiectasis (BE) has been traditionally associated with neutrophilic inflammation, but eosinophilic bronchiectasis (EB) has recently emerged. Data about prevalence, clinical features, and disease severity are lacking. This study aimed to assess the EB prevalence, compare EB with non-EB, evaluate the Type-2 (T2) high endotype in BE (T2-high EB) versus non-T2-high EB, and identify EB predictors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
December 2024
Background: Biological therapies, such as mepolizumab, have transformed the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Although mepolizumab's short-term effectiveness is established, there is limited evidence on its ability to achieve long-term clinical remission.
Objective: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab, explore its potential to induce clinical and sustained remission, and identify baseline factors associated with the likelihood of achieving remission over 24 months.
Background And Objective: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that benralizumab is characterized by a good profile of efficacy and safety, thereby being potentially able to elicit clinical remission on-treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). The main goal of this multicentre observational study was to verify the effectiveness of benralizumab in inducing a sustained remission on-treatment of SEA in patients with or without comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
Methods: Throughout 2 years of treatment with benralizumab, a four-component evaluation of sustained remission of SEA was performed, including the assessment of SEA exacerbations, use of oral corticosteroids (OCSs), symptom control and lung function.
Introduction: Clinical remission (CliR) achievement has been recognized as a new potential outcome in severe asthma. Nevertheless, we still lack a detailed profile of what features could better identify patients undergoing clinical remission. In this study, we aim to address this issue, tracing a possible identikit of patients fulfilling remission criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The current definition of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) super-responders to biologic treatment does not include patients with other eosinophil-based comorbidities. Although eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is frequently associated with SEA, we lack data on a possible super-response to biologic treatments in patients suffering from these two diseases. We aim to assess super-responder features in real-life patients with SEA and EGPA treated with mepolizumab and benralizumab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pers Med
September 2023
Asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory diseases, affecting over 300 million people worldwide [...
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare vasculitis characterized by asthma, systemic manifestations, and blood and tissue eosinophilia.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab (anti-IL-5) and benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα) in EGPA for 24 months.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study, including patients with EGPA treated with anti-IL-5/Rα biologics in 9 Italian specialized facilities.
Background: Mepolizumab and benralizumab are monoclonal antibodies directed against anti-IL-5 and anti-IL5R, respectively, and their use reduces the exacerbation rate and maintains oral corticosteroid requirements in severe eosinophilic asthma. Previous studies have tested the therapeutic switch between two biologics with excellent results, further demonstrating the heterogeneity of asthmatic disease and the complexity of the therapeutic choice. It remains unclear if such patients may improve following a switch from mepolizumab to benralizumab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF: The co-presence of bronchiectasis (BE) in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is common. Data about the effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with SEA and BE (SEA + BE) are lacking. : The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of benralizumab and remission rates in patients with SEA compared to SEA + BE, also according to BE severity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurrently, three classes of monoclonal antibodies targeting type 2 inflammation pathways are available in Italy for the treatment of severe asthma: anti-IgE (Omalizumab), anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα (Mepolizumab and Benralizumab), and anti-IL-4Rα (Dupilumab). Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies have been conducted to define their efficacy and identify baseline patients' characteristics potentially predictive of favorable outcomes. Switching to another monoclonal antibody is recommended in case of a lack of benefits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF