A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Variations in Dentists' Thresholds for Restorative Treatment of Active Non-Cavitated Carious Lesions: A Multinational Cross-sectional Study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To assess patterns across 21 countries in dentists' thresholds for initiating operative treatment of active non-cavitated carious lesions and to evaluate the influence of caries risk, clinician characteristics, and geographic variation on decision-making in accordance with current guidelines.

Methods: A cross-sectional, vignette-style web-based survey was conducted between June and October 2023 across 21 countries. A standardized questionnaire, comprising theoretical radiographic scenarios of occlusal and approximal active non-cavitated carious lesions at four progressive stages (E1,E2,EDJ,D1), was distributed to general dentists and specialists. Respondents selected the radiographic threshold at which they would initiate invasive treatment for patients with low and high caries risk. Guideline-concordant benchmarks were predefined as D1 for low-risk and EDJ/D1 for high-risk; any earlier choice was coded as overtreatment. Cumulative-link mixed models estimated determinants of thresholds; guideline concordance was summarized descriptively.

Results: A total of 3,680 dentists provided 7,360 valid responses. High caries risk significantly predicted earlier intervention (occlusal OR= 0.34; approximal OR= 0.38, p<0.001). Female dentists and restorative specialists were more conservative, while age showed no significant effect. Overall guideline adherence was low (22.7% in low-risk and 32.7% in high-risk scenarios). Substantial inter-country variation was observed; Bangladesh and Portugal showed highest adherence, while Kazakhstan and Colombia demonstrated overtreatment tendencies.

Conclusions: Despite global promotion of minimally invasive dentistry, overtreatment of enamel lesions remains widespread. Addressing systemic, educational, and policy-level barriers is essential to improve adherence to evidence-based, risk-informed caries management.

Clinical Significance: This multinational study highlights substantial variability and premature intervention in caries management across countries. Identifying patterns of overtreatment and guideline discordance informs dental education and policy, emphasizing the urgent need to reinforce minimally invasive, risk-based strategies in clinical practice across participating countries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106092DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active non-cavitated
12
non-cavitated carious
12
carious lesions
12
caries risk
12
dentists' thresholds
8
treatment active
8
high caries
8
variations dentists'
4
thresholds restorative
4
restorative treatment
4

Similar Publications