A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Optimization of ciliary body cyclophotocoagulation settings: a randomized and controlled pilot study. | LitMetric

Optimization of ciliary body cyclophotocoagulation settings: a randomized and controlled pilot study.

Can J Ophthalmol

Département d'Ophtalmologie et d'Ophtalmologie et d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie-Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, QC, Canada; Centre Universitaire d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, QC, Canada.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of different settings in continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCPC).

Design: Prospective, randomized, triple-blind clinical trial in a single tertiary center.

Participants: Adult glaucoma patients who need continuous wave-transscleral cyclophotocoagulation to control intraocular pressure (IOP) or prevent or treat ocular pain/discomfort secondary to increased IOP.

Methods: Group A uses 1 250 mW for 4 seconds. Group B uses 2 000 mW for 2 seconds.

Main Outcome Measures: IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, glaucoma medication, complications, and the need to retreat.

Results: Eighteen and 19 eyes in group A and group B, respectively, were included. Groups were comparable at baseline (p > 0.1) for mean age (76.9, 73.5 years), mean IOP (29.1, 29.8 mm Hg), mean logMAR visual acuity (1.6, 1.7), and mean number of glaucoma agents (3.4, 3.4). IOP was comparable between groups at 1 (15.6, 13.7 mm Hg), 4-6 (14.6, 14.8 mm Hg) and 12 months (10.3, 17.3 mm Hg; p = 0.07). There was a trend toward more medication reduction earlier in group B at 1 and 4-6 months (p = 0.11). Complication rates were similar between groups (group A: n = 6; group B: n = 9), with more serious complications in group B. Reintervention was required in 5 patients in group A, and 3 patients in group B after a mean of 4.7 and 6.7 months, respectively.

Conclusions: Both techniques are efficient and comparable in reducing IOP. Our study favours the 1 250 mW for 4 seconds group, with its possibly better safety profile.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.08.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group
11
seconds group
8
visual acuity
8
patients group
8
iop
5
optimization ciliary
4
ciliary body
4
body cyclophotocoagulation
4
cyclophotocoagulation settings
4
settings randomized
4

Similar Publications