98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Cadonilimab (AK104) is a bispecific antibody that simultaneously targets programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. It has received approval for the treatment of cervical cancer and gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. This meta-analysis aims to assess cadonilimab's safety profile.
Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify clinical trials that reported cadonilimab's safety data. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was the primary endpoint, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were the secondary endpoints. A single-group proportion meta-analysis was conducted by R software.
Results: A total of 1271 patients across more than five cancer types in 11 clinical trials were included in this study. The incidence of any grade irAEs, grade ≥ 3 irAEs, irAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and irAEs associated with mortality was 43.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.3%-53.4%], 11.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-13.3%), 3.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-6.5%), and 0% (95% CI, 0%-0.4%), respectively. Hypothyroidism was the most common all-grade irAEs (13.3%, 95% CI, 8.9%-18.5%). The incidence of TRAEs was higher in the combined therapy group compared to the cadonilimab monotherapy group.
Conclusions: The irAEs associated with cadonilimab are generally manageable. When combining with other anticancer agents, physicians and pharmacists should be particularly aware of the potential increase in TRAEs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405967 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71210 | DOI Listing |
Wounds
August 2025
Department of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Ceará, Brazil.
Background: To estimate the prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds.
Methods: The authors performed a systematic review of prevalence studies and meta-analysis, structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were searched in Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), MEDLINE/PubMed (National Institutes of Health), and Embase (Elsevier) databases.
J Neurol
September 2025
Department of General Practice, The First People's Hospital of Lin'an District, Hangzhou, Lin'an People's Hospital Affiliated to Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Anti-mGluR1 encephalitis is a rare autoimmune disorder manifesting with cerebellar syndrome with varying levels of severity. However, limited data exist regarding the clinical features and treatment strategies for patients suffering from encephalitis associated with anti-mGluR1 antibodies. Herein, we comprehensively review and discuss clinical features of anti-mGluR1 encephalitis to enhance our understanding of this rare disorder.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Colorectal Dis
September 2025
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2ZD, Scotland, UK.
Background: The optimal management of synchronous rectal cancer (RC) and prostate cancer (PC) remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates treatment strategies and reports postoperative, oncological, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients treated with curative intent.
Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024598049).
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background: The implementation of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for perihilar (PHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) remains limited and a systematic review including only comparative studies of MILS versus the open approach is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in patients with hilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.
Methods: Systematic review in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for original studies comparing at least five patients undergoing MILS with open liver surgery for PHC and IHC.
Surg Endosc
September 2025
Division of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is used more commonly, but this surge is mostly based on observational data. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between MIPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD published before December 10, 2024.