Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the current gold standard for the management of acute cholecystitis, where ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection are the two primary techniques used, however, it remains uncertain which approach is safer and more effective.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in LC for acute cholecystitis, particularly in operative time, hospital stay, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 7, 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection in LC for acute cholecystitis. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4), with heterogeneity assessed using I statistics and a random-effects model where necessary.

Results: A total of 28 RCTs, comprising 3383 patients (1720 in the ultrasonic dissection group and 1663 in the electrocautery group), were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that ultrasonic dissection significantly reduced operative time (- 9.13 min, 95% CI - 9.65 to - 8.61, p < 0.0001, I = 97%), hospital stay (- 0.95 days, 95% CI - 1.74 to - 0.17, p = 0.02, I = 100%), and blood loss (- 27.60 ml, 95% CI - 38.48 to - 16.72, p < 0.00001, I = 98%). Subgroup analysis reduced heterogeneity in some outcomes. Risk-of-bias assessment showed variability in study quality, with concerns in allocation concealment and performance bias in certain RCTs.

Conclusion: Ultrasonic dissection demonstrated advantages over electrocautery dissection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis, including reduced operative time, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. While some heterogeneity was observed among studies, ultrasonic dissection appears to be a safer and more efficient technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12132-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasonic dissection
24
electrocautery dissection
16
acute cholecystitis
16
dissection
10
dissection versus
8
versus electrocautery
8
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
dissection electrocautery
8

Similar Publications

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the current gold standard for the management of acute cholecystitis, where ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection are the two primary techniques used, however, it remains uncertain which approach is safer and more effective.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in LC for acute cholecystitis, particularly in operative time, hospital stay, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 7, 2025, following PRISMA guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although force transfer during elongation occurs longitudinally and transversely, the influence of transverse force transfer between the biceps femoris long head and short head remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether separating the intermuscular connections between the biceps femoris long head and short head alters tension in the biceps femoris long head. Eight human cadaver legs were used, and ultrasonic shear wave elastography measurements were performed under four conditions: (1) intact, (2) removal of all tissues from the skin to the deep fascia, (3) intermuscular dissection, and (4) biceps femoris short head detachment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep learning-based prediction of axillary pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer using longitudinal multiregional ultrasound.

EBioMedicine

August 2025

Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou, 510080, China. Electron

Background: Noninvasive biomarkers that capture the longitudinal multiregional tumour burden in patients with breast cancer may improve the assessment of residual nodal disease and guide axillary surgery. Additionally, a significant barrier to the clinical translation of the current data-driven deep learning model is the lack of interpretability. This study aims to develop and validate an information shared-private (iShape) model to predict axillary pathological complete response in patients with axillary lymph node (ALN)-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) by learning common and specific image representations from longitudinal primary tumour and ALN ultrasound images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Water-Jet (WJ) dissection is an innovative technique for liver surgery that uses high-pressure saline jets to selectively dissect liver parenchyma while preserving vascular and biliary structures. Compared to the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), WJ offers advantages such as reduced thermal damage, lower blood loss, and shorter operative times. These benefits are particularly important in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), where donor safety and rapid recovery are critical.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/purpose: A standardized liver parenchymal transection method in robotic-assisted liver resection has not yet been established, and the techniques used vary among institutions. We developed a novel transection technique for robotic-assisted liver resection termed "Trac & Pac," which uses maryland bipolar forceps with a gentle stroking motion and strategic traction to progressively expose and dissect the liver parenchyma.

Methods: We described the technical details of "Trac & Pac" and Evaluated its short-term outcomes (2022-2025), comparing them with those of conventional laparoscopic liver resection using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) (2018-2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF