98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: In the phase 3 FRESCO-2 study, fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We present the results of a FRESCO-2 post hoc subgroup analysis evaluating outcomes of patients enrolled in Japan.
Methods: In FRESCO-2, patients had previously received all standard chemotherapies, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies if indicated, and had progressed on, or were intolerant to trifluridine-tipiracil and/or regorafenib. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib 5 mg or matching placebo by mouth once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day cycles, plus BSC. The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.
Results: Of the 56 patients enrolled in Japan, 40 (71.4%) and 16 (28.6%) were randomized to fruquintinib and placebo, respectively. OS was improved with fruquintinib versus placebo (median 6.9 vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19 - 0.92). PFS was also improved with fruquintinib versus placebo (median 3.6 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.27; 95% CI 0.13 - 0.56). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with fruquintinib versus placebo was 71.8% versus 29.4%; the most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs with fruquintinib were hypertension (23.1%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (17.9%).
Conclusions: Fruquintinib improved OS and PFS versus placebo in FRESCO-2 patients enrolled in Japan and demonstrated a manageable safety profile. Results from the Japan subgroup were consistent with the global FRESCO-2 population, thus supporting fruquintinib as a novel treatment option for patients in Japan with refractory mCRC.
Clinical Trial Details: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04322539.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02852-9 | DOI Listing |
Adv Ther
September 2025
Sanofi, Gentilly, France.
Introduction: No head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) with cipaglucosidase alfa + miglustat (Cipa+mig) have been conducted in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Two indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) were conducted to estimate the effects of AVA versus Cipa+mig.
Methods: ITCs were conducted using simulated treatment comparisons (STCs), adjusting for differences in prognostic factors and treatment effect modifiers.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg
September 2025
Montefiore Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx.
Front Pharmacol
August 2025
Medical Insurance Office, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
Methods: A Markov model was developed to track patients' transitions over 3-week cycles and evaluate the health and economic outcomes over a 10-year horizon for the two competing treatments. The survival data were gathered from the KEYNOTE-355 trial, and cost and utility values were obtained from the published studies.
Front Pharmacol
August 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Introduction: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy (primarily assessed by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and cardiovascular event (CVE) incidence) and safety (total adverse events (AEs), neurocognitive events (NCEs), injection site reactions, infections, and all-cause mortality (ACM)) of different Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors placebo in the general population and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.
Materials And Methods: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 79,615 patients were included. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool evaluated the literature quality.