98%
921
2 minutes
20
Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled. All participants underwent three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography, and biplanar fluoroscopic images were captured during the stance phase of gait for barefoot and three different shoe types. 3D kinematic data of the ankle and subtalar joints were calculated using the anatomical coordinate system through the 3D/2D registration method. Running shoes (RS) significantly reduced maximum ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.007), hindfoot dorsiflexion (p = 0.001) compared with barefoot. Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) reduced ankle and hindfoot DF-PF ROM (p < 0.001), and increased subtalar ROM by increasing subtalar plantarflexion(p = 0.047). Climbing shoes reduced the peak hindfoot dorsiflexion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (p = 0.013). High heels (HH) caused significant ankle (p < 0.001) and hindfoot (p < 0.001) plantar flexion, along with increased hindfoot inversion (p = 0.008) and internal rotation (p = 0.003). In conclusion, Shoed walking reduced dorsiflexion compared with barefoot walking, potentially benefiting conditions such as anterior ankle impingement. RBSs may alleviate arthritis symptoms by limiting motion, whereas HHs increase hindfoot inversion, potentially increasing the risk of ankle injury and long-term joint damage.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112914 | DOI Listing |
J Biomech
October 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Unlike Skin marker-based models, biplanar fluoroscopy can evaluate the kinematic effects of various shoes. This study investigated foot and ankle kinematics across various shoe types during walking using a biplanar fluoroscopic system. Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Sports Act Living
July 2025
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Introduction: While the biomechanics of lower extremity during running and the impact of conventional running shoes on these traits have been extensively investigated, the influence of bionic shoes on runners remains largely, especially those runners with different experience levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical differences between experienced and novice runners when wearing two distinct types of footwear: bionic shoes and neutral shoes.
Methods: Fourteen healthy male heel-strike runners participated and completed the running test wearing two pairs of running shoes respectively.
Objectives: Prosthetic feet are designed to fulfil the function of the ankle-foot part. It is an important part of lower extremity prostheses. Although there are many different types of prosthetic feet, it is difficult to determine the most suitable prosthetic foot for each amputee.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Public Health
August 2025
Office of Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Standard, outlined in 29 CFR 1910 Subpart I states that Protective gear - including personal protective clothing, respiratory equipment, and barriers or shields- must be supplied, properly used, and kept clean and functional whenever there are hazards present. These hazards may arise from processes, environmental conditions, chemicals, radiation, or mechanical sources that could potentially cause injury or harm bodily functions through skin contact, inhalation, or absorption. Employers must supply PPE to their employees as determined by hazard assessments of the workplace and duties performed by employees.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF