Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Preheating bulk-fill resins reduces their viscosity, facilitates their adaptation, and improves polymerization by accelerating the activity of photoinitiators. This would allow for more efficient application and deeper curing. The study's objective was to compare the surface microhardness and depth of cure of three bulk-fill composite resins with and without preheating.

Material And Methods: Sixty samples were prepared from three different materials, Aura Bulk Fill, Filtek One Bulk Fill, and Opus Bulk Fill, in standardized molds. A Vickers electronic hardness tester was used to measure the surface microhardness. The depth of cure was calculated using the upper-to-lower microhardness ratio for each sample. Robust Student's T was used to compare two independent measures, and Welch's robust ANOVA was used to compare more than two independent measures with Games Howell's post hoc. Significance was set at <0.05.

Results: It was observed that the preheated Aura Bulk Fill and Filtek One Bulk Fill resins had significantly higher surface microhardness than the same resins without preheating (<0.001 and =0.038, respectively). On the other hand, the non-preheated Opus Bulk Fill resin had significantly higher surface microhardness than the same resin preheated ( = 0.046). In addition, it was evident that the Filtek One Bulk Fill resin had a greater depth of cure than the Aura Bulk Fill resin ( = 0.011). This, in turn, had a greater depth of cure than Opus Bulk Fill resin ( = 0.003). Finally, with and without preheating, no significant differences existed in the depth of cure of the Bulk Fill resins evaluated (>0.05).

Conclusions: Preheating significantly increased the surface microhardness in Aura Bulk Fill and Filtek One Bulk Fill resin, while it caused the opposite effect in Opus Bulk Fill resin. In addition, preheating did not increase the depth of cure of each Bulk Fill resin evaluated. Finally, with and without preheating, Filtek One Bulk Fill resin presented higher surface microhardness and depth of cure than Aura Bulk Fill and Opus Bulk Fill resins. Preheating, bulk-fill composite resin, depth of cure, microhardness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357508PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.62844DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bulk fill
16
surface microhardness
12
microhardness depth
12
depth cure
12
compare independent
8
independent measures
8
bulk
4
cure bulk
4
fill
4
fill resin
4

Similar Publications

Herein, a fluoroalkyl side chain modified A-DA'D-A small molecule acceptor, Y18-F9, was developed to optimize the bulk heterojunction morphology in organic solar cells. The introduction of fluorocarbon chains promotes self-assembly into nanoscale fibrous networks, while the low surface energy drive favorable vertical phase segregation. These synergistic effects lead to enhanced molecular packing, improved charge transport and collection, and reduced recombination losses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current most mature, competitive, and dominant battery technology for electric vehicles (EVs) is the Li-ion battery (LIB). As future EVs will rely on battery technology, further innovation is essential for the success of mobility electrification towards improving the driving range and reducing the charging time and price competitiveness. The commonly cited next generation technologies are hybrid and solid-state batteries (SSBs) enabling high energy densities using lithium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study investigated the effect of a 45% carbamide peroxide-containing office-type bleaching agent on the microhardness (MH) and surface roughness (SR) of flowable and paste-type bulk-fill composite resins.

Methods: This study used two bulk-fill composite resins, 3 M Filtek Bulk-Fill (paste) and Estelite Bulk-Fill Flow (flowable). Twenty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and divided into two groups according to the type of bulk-fill materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This in vitro study aims to compare the effect of different light curing modes and curing times on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness (MH) of three different bulk fill composites at two different depths.

Materials And Methods: A total of 224 cylindrical specimens (4 mm height, 6 mm diameter) were prepared using four composites: SDR Plus, Ever X Posterior (EXP), Beautifil Bulk Restorative (BBR), and Tetric N Ceram (TNC). Each material group (n = 56) was subdivided into four curing subgroups based on light-curing mode (Low Power or High Power) and exposure time (20-30 s).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Bulk-fill flowable resin composites have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in restoring Class I and II cavities in vital teeth. However, their performance in endodontically treated teeth remains unclear. This randomized, controlled, and double-blind pilot clinical trial aimed to evaluate the one-year clinical performance of direct restorations in endodontically treated premolars, using either a conventional incremental technique or a technique incorporating a bulk-fill flowable composite base.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF