98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study evaluates methods for removing Cherenkov radiation (CR) from plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs), focusing on constraints specific to a 0.35 T MR-Linac system.
Methods: Five CR-removal methods were examined: cross calibration, fiber alone, multiloop, collimator rotation, and couch rotation. The first three (cross calibration, fiber alone, and multiloop) were tested on a 0.35 T MR-Linac (ViewRay Inc., USA) using the BluePhysics PSD (Blue Physics LLC, USA). These methods do not require collimator or couch rotation. The remaining two methods (collimator rotation and couch rotation) were tested on a Varian TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, USA) for comparison. Measurements were performed under various setup configurations, and Cherenkov radiation extraction (CRE) values were calculated to determine each method's effectiveness.
Results: The multiloop approach yielded a CRE of 0.7288, making it the most practical and robust for MR-Linac constraints because it requires neither collimator nor couch rotation. The cross calibration and fiber alone methods produced CRE values of 0.7318 and 0.7569, respectively. Collimator rotation gave 0.7255, comparable to multiloop. In contrast, couch rotation resulted in 0.7489 but exhibited more variability, suggesting lower reliability.
Conclusion: The multiloop method emerged as the most practical and robust technique for CR removal in 0.35 T MR-Linac systems. Its simplicity and compatibility with MR-Linac design constraints make it a highly effective approach for CR removal in PSD-based radiotherapy applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356693 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70202 | DOI Listing |
J Appl Clin Med Phys
August 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Purpose: This study evaluates methods for removing Cherenkov radiation (CR) from plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs), focusing on constraints specific to a 0.35 T MR-Linac system.
Methods: Five CR-removal methods were examined: cross calibration, fiber alone, multiloop, collimator rotation, and couch rotation.
Radiol Phys Technol
September 2025
Radiation Therapy Department, Sagara Hospital, Social Medical Corporation Hakuaikai, 3-31, Matsubaracho, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, 892-0833, Japan.
This study evaluated the positioning precision of various surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) systems to enhance patient setup accuracy in radiotherapy. A female torso phantom (Electronics Research & Development Corporation) was employed to assess and compare the accuracy of four SGRT devices: AlignRT (Vision RT, United Kingdom), Catalyst (C-rad AB, Sweden), VOXELAN (Electronics Research&Development Corporation, Okayama, Japan) and ExacTrac Dynamic (Brainlab, Germany). The external body contour was used as a reference surface image.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Dosim
July 2025
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK; Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
This treatment planning study aims to evaluate the feasibility of ncVMAT for patients receiving OCSCC radiotherapy and whether ncVMAT will help to achieve optimal mandible dose constraints. About 10 cases of ORN were identified in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative (C)RT between November 2014 and November 2017. Scoping for optimal planning technique was performed by comparing original plans with 5 alternative solutions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn Vivo
June 2025
Department of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Background/aim: This study assessed the positional detection accuracy of the Catalyst HD system for intracranial stereotactic irradiation (STI) under clinically relevant conditions, including variations in head posture, isocenter position, and couch angle.
Materials And Methods: An anthropomorphic head phantom was used to simulate three head postures, chin-up, neutral, and chin-down, each stabilized with a corresponding thermoplastic mask. Seven isocenter positions were defined: one central position and six offset positions, each 5 cm away in a cardinal direction.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi
June 2025
Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the detection accuracy of a high-definition optical surface imaging (OSI) system for non-coplanar radiotherapy (by rotating a phantom instead of a couch rotation).
Methods: The constancy, reproducibility, and accuracy of the positioning of the OSI system, Catalyst HD (CHD), for non-coplanar treatment were examined by rotating the head phantom around the isocenter. For all the tests, the phantom was rotated by ±30°, ±45°, ±60°, ±90° after correction of the phantom position within 0.