A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Reduction of mandibular doses using noncoplanar VMAT radiotherapy in the adjuvant management of locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell cancers. | LitMetric

Reduction of mandibular doses using noncoplanar VMAT radiotherapy in the adjuvant management of locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell cancers.

Med Dosim

The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK; Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

This treatment planning study aims to evaluate the feasibility of ncVMAT for patients receiving OCSCC radiotherapy and whether ncVMAT will help to achieve optimal mandible dose constraints. About 10 cases of ORN were identified in patients with OCSCC who received postoperative (C)RT between November 2014 and November 2017. Scoping for optimal planning technique was performed by comparing original plans with 5 alternative solutions. A noncoplanar solution with one full arc with couch at zero and 2 half-arcs with the couch rotated 45° for each was deemed optimal (minimizing mandibular dose whilst maintaining parotid sparing and avoiding excess dose to optics). Plans were re-optimized using this technique, attempting to improve mandibular V50Gy and D30%. Mean improvement in mandibular doses were most pronounced in Dmean and V50Gy. Applying optimal ncVMAT technique led to reduced mandibular V50Gy, maintained parotid sparing and improved PTV coverage. Mean reduction in mandibular V50 was modest (5.6%), 3 cases (all with centralized high dose PTV with floor of mouth/oral tongue primaries) showed dramatic improvements in V50Gy with reductions of 13.6%, 12.2% and 23.3%. Mandibular sparing can be achieved by ncVMAT without increasing parotid doses but with marginal increases to optic structures. This improvement may confer to reduced frequency of ORN if examined in prospective randomized trial. Dosimetric benefit seems to be greatest in those with central floor of mouth or oral tongue primary cancers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2025.06.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reduction mandibular
8
mandibular doses
8
parotid sparing
8
mandibular v50gy
8
mandibular
6
doses noncoplanar
4
noncoplanar vmat
4
vmat radiotherapy
4
radiotherapy adjuvant
4
adjuvant management
4

Similar Publications